CCFN
Price
$47.50
Change
+$1.45 (+3.15%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
104.55M
CCRDF
Price
$6.21
Change
+$0.18 (+2.99%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCFN vs CCRDF

Header iconCCFN vs CCRDF Comparison
Open Charts CCFN vs CCRDFBanner chart's image
Muncy Columbia Financial
Price$47.50
Change+$1.45 (+3.15%)
Volume$363
Capitalization104.55M
Concordia Financial Group
Price$6.21
Change+$0.18 (+2.99%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.59B
CCFN vs CCRDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCFN vs. CCRDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCFN is a Hold and CCRDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCFN: $47.50 vs. CCRDF: $6.21)
Brand notoriety: CCFN and CCRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCFN: 26% vs. CCRDF: 69%
Market capitalization -- CCFN: $104.55M vs. CCRDF: $5.59B
CCFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $104.55M. CCRDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCFN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCCRDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CCFN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CCFN and CCRDF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCFN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCRDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CCRDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCRDF is a better buy in the short-term than CCFN.

Price Growth

CCFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.15% price change this week, while CCRDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCRDF($5.59B) has a higher market cap than CCFN($105M). CCFN YTD gains are higher at: 17.006 vs. CCRDF (6.346). CCFN has less debt than CCRDF: CCFN (114M) vs CCRDF (2.28T). CCRDF has higher revenues than CCFN: CCRDF (268B) vs CCFN (26.6M).
CCFNCCRDFCCFN / CCRDF
Capitalization105M5.59B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.0066.346268%
P/E RatioN/A12.48-
Revenue26.6M268B0%
Total Cash11.1MN/A-
Total Debt114M2.28T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCFN vs CCRDF: Fundamental Ratings
CCFN
CCRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5814
SMR RATING
1..100
411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCRDF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as CCFN (40). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to CCFN’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCFN (58). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCFN’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCFN (41). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCFN’s over the last 12 months.

CCFN's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRDF (55). This means that CCFN’s stock grew similarly to CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as CCFN (97). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to CCFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCFNCCRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMOWX19.010.29
+1.55%
GMO Resources VI
TGVFX53.260.56
+1.06%
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth A
MGPSX77.600.59
+0.77%
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Svc
GHAAX42.26N/A
N/A
VanEck Global Resources Fund A
DISYX24.08-0.02
-0.08%
BNY Mellon International Stock Fund Y

CCFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCFN has been loosely correlated with BKQNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCFN jumps, then BKQNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCFN
1D Price
Change %
CCFN100%
N/A
BKQNF - CCFN
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MLYNF - CCFN
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAFC - CCFN
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
CEFC - CCFN
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
CCRDF - CCFN
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and SUTNY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and SUTNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
N/A
SUTNY - CCRDF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
LLAZF - CCRDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFG - CCRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
BCAL - CCRDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More