Advertisement
CCEP vs MNST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCEP is a Buy and MNST is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +5.79% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +3.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.25% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CCEP | MNST | CCEP / MNST | |
| Capitalization | 42.1B | 68.9B | 61% |
| EBITDA | 3.35B | 2.16B | 155% |
| Gain YTD | 21.469 | 34.094 | 63% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.17 | 40.05 | 60% |
| Revenue | 20.9B | 7.66B | 273% |
| Total Cash | 2.06B | 2.07B | 99% |
| Total Debt | 12B | 199M | 6,030% |
CCEP | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 26 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCEP's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (91) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as MNST (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's SMR Rating (39) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (92) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (49) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as MNST (31) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BBCA | 88.89 | 1.18 | +1.35% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | |||
| HFRO | 6.47 | N/A | N/A |
| Highland Opportunities and Income Fund | |||
| EYEG | 35.96 | N/A | N/A |
| AB Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| GUMI | 50.22 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Goldman Sachs Ultra Shrt Muncpl Inc ETF | |||
| FIAX | 18.16 | N/A | -0.02% |
| Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF | |||
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| KO - CCEP | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| KDP - CCEP | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
More | ||||