CCEL
Price
$5.05
Change
-$0.05 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
61.83M
5 days until earnings call
FMCQF
Price
$57.07
Change
-$1.03 (-1.77%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
13.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCEL vs FMCQF

Header iconCCEL vs FMCQF Comparison
Open Charts CCEL vs FMCQFBanner chart's image
Cryo-Cell International
Price$5.05
Change-$0.05 (-0.98%)
Volume$6.89K
Capitalization61.83M
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$57.07
Change-$1.03 (-1.77%)
Volume$215
Capitalization13.88B
CCEL vs FMCQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCEL vs. FMCQF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCEL is a Hold and FMCQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CCEL: $5.05 vs. FMCQF: $57.07)
Brand notoriety: CCEL and FMCQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCEL: 58% vs. FMCQF: 10%
Market capitalization -- CCEL: $61.83M vs. FMCQF: $13.88B
CCEL [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $61.83M. FMCQF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $13.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCEL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCQF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCEL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FMCQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCEL is a better buy in the long-term than FMCQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCEL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCQF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCEL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FMCQF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMCQF is a better buy in the short-term than CCEL.

Price Growth

CCEL (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -7.00% price change this week, while FMCQF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCEL is expected to report earnings on Jul 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.64% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMCQF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than CCEL($61.8M). FMCQF has higher P/E ratio than CCEL: FMCQF (22.03) vs CCEL (16.37). FMCQF YTD gains are higher at: 25.755 vs. CCEL (-27.545). FMCQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.35B vs. CCEL (6.98M). FMCQF has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. CCEL (1.21M). CCEL has less debt than FMCQF: CCEL (12.5M) vs FMCQF (13.3B). FMCQF has higher revenues than CCEL: FMCQF (19.6B) vs CCEL (31.2M).
CCELFMCQFCCEL / FMCQF
Capitalization61.8M13.9B0%
EBITDA6.98M3.35B0%
Gain YTD-27.54525.755-107%
P/E Ratio16.3722.0374%
Revenue31.2M19.6B0%
Total Cash1.21M1.22B0%
Total Debt12.5M13.3B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCEL vs FMCQF: Fundamental Ratings
CCEL
FMCQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1284
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
449
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMCQF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CCEL (25). This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to CCEL’s over the last 12 months.

FMCQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CCEL (100). This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to CCEL’s over the last 12 months.

CCEL's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMCQF (84). This means that CCEL’s stock grew significantly faster than FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCQF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CCEL (64). This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to CCEL’s over the last 12 months.

CCEL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMCQF (49). This means that CCEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCELFMCQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCTKY9.602.04
+26.98%
Nabtesco Corp.
PILBF1.010.09
+9.60%
PILBARA MINERALS LTD
ACUT0.90N/A
N/A
Accustem Sciences Inc.
ELRRF0.94-0.02
-1.80%
Eloro Resources Ltd.
NTMFF0.10N/A
-3.23%
NEOTECH METALS CORP

CCEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCEL and NWKHY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCEL and NWKHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCEL
1D Price
Change %
CCEL100%
-0.96%
NWKHY - CCEL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOI - CCEL
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
FSNUY - CCEL
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
PIII - CCEL
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.63%
BDUUY - CCEL
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FMCQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMCQF and FSNUY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMCQF and FSNUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCQF
1D Price
Change %
FMCQF100%
N/A
FSNUY - FMCQF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
AMED - FMCQF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
OPCH - FMCQF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
CCEL - FMCQF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
FSNUF - FMCQF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More