CCDBF
Price
$58.03
Change
-$1.03 (-1.74%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.14B
TCLAF
Price
$14.74
Change
-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCDBF vs TCLAF

Header iconCCDBF vs TCLAF Comparison
Open Charts CCDBF vs TCLAFBanner chart's image
CCL Industries
Price$58.03
Change-$1.03 (-1.74%)
Volume$25.22K
Capitalization10.14B
Transcontinental
Price$14.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization1.23B
CCDBF vs TCLAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCDBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCDBF vs. TCLAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCDBF is a Hold and TCLAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CCDBF: $58.03 vs. TCLAF: $14.74)
Brand notoriety: CCDBF and TCLAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCDBF: 184% vs. TCLAF: 12%
Market capitalization -- CCDBF: $10.14B vs. TCLAF: $1.23B
CCDBF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $10.14B. TCLAF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCDBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTCLAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCDBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TCLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCDBF is a better buy in the long-term than TCLAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCDBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCLAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCDBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TCLAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCLAF is a better buy in the short-term than CCDBF.

Price Growth

CCDBF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while TCLAF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.33% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCDBF($10.1B) has a higher market cap than TCLAF($1.23B). CCDBF has higher P/E ratio than TCLAF: CCDBF (17.95) vs TCLAF (9.50). TCLAF YTD gains are higher at: 25.934 vs. CCDBF (13.226). CCDBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.61B vs. TCLAF (498M). CCDBF has more cash in the bank: 962M vs. TCLAF (43.2M). TCLAF has less debt than CCDBF: TCLAF (843M) vs CCDBF (2.6B). CCDBF has higher revenues than TCLAF: CCDBF (7.48B) vs TCLAF (2.78B).
CCDBFTCLAFCCDBF / TCLAF
Capitalization10.1B1.23B818%
EBITDA1.61B498M322%
Gain YTD13.22625.93451%
P/E Ratio17.959.50189%
Revenue7.48B2.78B270%
Total Cash962M43.2M2,227%
Total Debt2.6B843M308%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCDBF vs TCLAF: Fundamental Ratings
CCDBF
TCLAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1825
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3974
SMR RATING
1..100
5472
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6991
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCLAF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as CCDBF (49). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to CCDBF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCLAF (74). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLAF (72). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew similarly to TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CCDBF (52). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to CCDBF’s over the last 12 months.

CCDBF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLAF (91). This means that CCDBF’s stock grew similarly to TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCDBFTCLAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
41%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCDBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOTI36.940.59
+1.62%
VanEck Morningstar Intl Moat ETF
RETL10.590.13
+1.24%
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X ETF
LLDR45.43N/A
N/A
Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF
SEIM43.67-0.12
-0.27%
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momt Fac ETF
OEF321.66-1.03
-0.32%
iShares S&P 100 ETF

CCDBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCDBF and TCLAF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCDBF and TCLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCDBF
1D Price
Change %
CCDBF100%
-1.74%
TCLAF - CCDBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMCCF - CCDBF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-5.72%
GRVWF - CCDBF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJSF - CCDBF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOYFF - CCDBF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TCLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLAF and CCDBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLAF and CCDBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCLAF
1D Price
Change %
TCLAF100%
N/A
CCDBF - TCLAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
SUMXF - TCLAF
19%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
RPKIF - TCLAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VKSC - TCLAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - TCLAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More