Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. CCCNX (1.03B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.16) vs SMFPX (3.19). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). CCCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. SMFPX (52.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. CCCNX (3.26). CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 183.81 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.12 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.956 | 8.213 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 1.29B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.16 | 3.19 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 6.78 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.87 | 66.05 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 183.81 | 123.81 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.17 | 182.43 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement