Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. CCCNX (1.06B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.79) vs SMFPX (3.42). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). CCCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.72 vs. SMFPX (13.06). CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 217.67 vs. SMFPX (153.05).
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.12 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.949 | 2.487 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.24B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.79 | 3.42 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | 13.06 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.69 | 56.48 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 217.67 | 153.05 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.28 | 54.46 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement