Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CCCNX (1.06B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.76) vs SMFPX (3.40). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). CCCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX (16.50) and SMFPX (16.26) have marching annual gain over last year. CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 187.10 vs. SMFPX (136.95).
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.12 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.490 | 3.485 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.28B | 83% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.76 | 3.40 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.50 | 16.26 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.16 | 53.06 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 187.10 | 136.95 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.41 | 47.42 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers