Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs GLPIX
CCCNX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. GLPIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a StrongBuy and GLPIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. CCCNX (1.02B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than CCCNX: GLPIX (7.02) vs CCCNX (6.24). CCCNX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCNX (15 years) vs GLPIX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCNX (91.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCNX (1000000). GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. CCCNX (1.96). CCCNX (202.96) and GLPIX (198.77) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCCNX | GLPIX | CCCNX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 6.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 6.74 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.574 | 2.232 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.58B | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.24 | 7.02 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | 4.39 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.06 | 51.57 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 202.96 | 198.77 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.88 | 76.77 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement