Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs GLPIX
CCCNX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. GLPIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Hold and GLPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. CCCNX (1.03B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than CCCNX: GLPIX (6.61) vs CCCNX (5.16). CCCNX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCNX (15 years) vs GLPIX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCNX (75.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.26 vs. GLPIX (1.79). CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 183.81 vs. GLPIX (170.82).
| CCCNX | GLPIX | CCCNX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 6.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 6.74 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.956 | 6.866 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 1.65B | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.16 | 6.61 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 1.79 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.87 | 60.00 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 183.81 | 170.82 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.17 | 137.23 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement