CCCMF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
876.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CSYJY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
536.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCCMF vs CSYJY

Header iconCCCMF vs CSYJY Comparison
Open Charts CCCMF vs CSYJYBanner chart's image
Cancom AG
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization876.7M
CSE Global
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization536.55M
CCCMF vs CSYJY Comparison Chart in %
CSYJY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCCMF vs. CSYJY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCMF is a Hold and CSYJY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CCCMF: $28.20 vs. CSYJY: $3.23)
Brand notoriety: CCCMF and CSYJY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCCMF: 100% vs. CSYJY: 100%
Market capitalization -- CCCMF: $876.7M vs. CSYJY: $536.55M
CCCMF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $876.7M. CSYJY’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $536.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $284.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCCMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSYJY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCCMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CSYJY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCCMF is a better buy in the long-term than CSYJY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSYJY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CSYJY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

CCCMF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CSYJY (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-0.73% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCCMF($877M) has a higher market cap than CSYJY($537M). CCCMF has higher P/E ratio than CSYJY: CCCMF (41.02) vs CSYJY (11.24). CSYJY YTD gains are higher at: -9.333 vs. CCCMF (-19.544). CCCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 99.5M vs. CSYJY (73.4M). CCCMF has more cash in the bank: 85.1M vs. CSYJY (49.4M). CSYJY has less debt than CCCMF: CSYJY (181M) vs CCCMF (192M). CCCMF has higher revenues than CSYJY: CCCMF (1.72B) vs CSYJY (873M).
CCCMFCSYJYCCCMF / CSYJY
Capitalization877M537M163%
EBITDA99.5M73.4M136%
Gain YTD-19.544-9.333209%
P/E Ratio41.0211.24365%
Revenue1.72B873M197%
Total Cash85.1M49.4M172%
Total Debt192M181M106%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCCMF vs CSYJY: Fundamental Ratings
CCCMF
CSYJY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4141
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
8769
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1651
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSYJY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CCCMF (5). This means that CSYJY’s stock grew similarly to CCCMF’s over the last 12 months.

CSYJY's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCCMF (100). This means that CSYJY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCCMF’s over the last 12 months.

CSYJY's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CCCMF (87). This means that CSYJY’s stock grew similarly to CCCMF’s over the last 12 months.

CSYJY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CCCMF (74). This means that CSYJY’s stock grew similarly to CCCMF’s over the last 12 months.

CCCMF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSYJY (51). This means that CCCMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSYJY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCCMFCSYJY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSYJY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIOOX12.890.06
+0.47%
Aristotle/Saul Global Equity I-2
PWTAX55.240.09
+0.16%
UBS US Allocation A
FLACX90.57N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel C
LADFX27.96-0.06
-0.21%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
LGORX27.79-0.10
-0.36%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R3

CCCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCCMF and CSPI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCCMF and CSPI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCCMF
1D Price
Change %
CCCMF100%
N/A
CSPI - CCCMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
CTSH - CCCMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
FWFW - CCCMF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BECTY - CCCMF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTST - CCCMF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
More

CSYJY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSYJY and CCCMF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSYJY and CCCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSYJY
1D Price
Change %
CSYJY100%
N/A
CCCMF - CSYJY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCSX - CSYJY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEJOF - CSYJY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFTLF - CSYJY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAXR - CSYJY
-0%
Poorly correlated
-24.63%
More