Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCAX vs SMFPX
CCCAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CCCAX (1.06B). CCCAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCAX (6.11) vs SMFPX (3.40). CCCAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCAX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CCCAX (1.51). CCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). CCCAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX (16.26) and CCCAX (15.87) have marching annual gain over last year. CCCAX return over 5 years is better than : 182.28 vs. SMFPX (136.95).
| CCCAX | SMFPX | CCCAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.069 | 3.485 | -2% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.28B | 83% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.11 | 3.40 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.87 | 16.26 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.35 | 53.06 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.28 | 136.95 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.04 | 47.42 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement