Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCAX vs GLPIX
CCCAX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCAX vs. GLPIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCAX is a Hold and GLPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.68B vs. CCCAX (1.05B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than CCCAX: GLPIX (6.61) vs CCCAX (5.49). CCCAX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCAX (15 years) vs GLPIX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than CCCAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCAX (75.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCAX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCAX (1000). CCCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.35 vs. GLPIX (1.99). CCCAX return over 5 years is better than : 180.02 vs. GLPIX (170.24).
| CCCAX | GLPIX | CCCAX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 6.74 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 6.74 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.136 | 7.544 | 108% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 1.68B | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.49 | 6.61 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.35 | 1.99 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.90 | 61.02 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.02 | 170.24 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.88 | 138.74 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement