Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCBTX vs FJAPX
CCBTX vs FJAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCBTX vs. FJAPX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCBTX is a Hold and FJAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. FJAPX (339M). FJAPX pays higher dividends than CCBTX: FJAPX (2.58) vs CCBTX (1.94). CCBTX was incepted earlier than FJAPX: CCBTX (11 years) vs FJAPX (7 years). CCBTX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FJAPX (0.32). FJAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. CCBTX (6.00). FJAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCBTX: FJAPX (0) vs CCBTX (250). FJAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. CCBTX (6.63). CCBTX (16.36) and FJAPX (15.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCBTX | FJAPX | CCBTX / FJAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.32 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.32 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.215 | 4.686 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 339M | 1,409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 2.58 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 7.11 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.44 | 23.62 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.36 | 15.65 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement