Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCBTX vs FFVCX
CCBTX vs FFVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCBTX vs. FFVCX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCBTX is a Hold and FFVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.77B vs. FFVCX (430M). CCBTX pays higher dividends than FFVCX: CCBTX (1.94) vs FFVCX (1.70). CCBTX was incepted earlier than FFVCX: CCBTX (11 years) vs FFVCX (22 years). FFVCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CCBTX (1.37). FFVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. CCBTX (6.00). FFVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCBTX: FFVCX (0) vs CCBTX (250). CCBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. FFVCX (2.84). CCBTX return over 5 years is better than : 16.38 vs. FFVCX (0.17).
| CCBTX | FFVCX | CCBTX / FFVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.52 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.52 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.050 | 2.323 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.77B | 430M | 1,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.70 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | 2.84 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.26 | 15.81 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.38 | 0.17 | 9,466% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.75 | -9.05 | -262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement