CCB
Price
$113.17
Change
+$2.78 (+2.52%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.67B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBS
Price
$76.58
Change
+$1.46 (+1.94%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.18B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCB vs SFBS

Header iconCCB vs SFBS Comparison
Open Charts CCB vs SFBSBanner chart's image
Coastal Financial
Price$113.17
Change+$2.78 (+2.52%)
Volume$1.04K
Capitalization1.67B
ServisFirst Bancshares
Price$76.58
Change+$1.46 (+1.94%)
Volume$191.55K
Capitalization4.18B
CCB vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
CCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCB vs. SFBS commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCB is a Hold and SFBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CCB: $110.39 vs. SFBS: $75.12)
Brand notoriety: CCB and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCB: 119% vs. SFBS: 85%
Market capitalization -- CCB: $1.67B vs. SFBS: $4.1B
CCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.67B. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $159.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCB is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the short-term than CCB.

Price Growth

CCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.47% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCB is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($4.18B) has a higher market cap than CCB($1.67B). CCB has higher P/E ratio than SFBS: CCB (34.71) vs SFBS (16.40). SFBS YTD gains are higher at: 5.195 vs. CCB (-3.665). CCB has less debt than SFBS: CCB (53M) vs SFBS (64.8M). SFBS has higher revenues than CCB: SFBS (528M) vs CCB (410M).
CCBSFBSCCB / SFBS
Capitalization1.67B4.18B40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.6655.195-71%
P/E Ratio34.7116.40212%
Revenue410M528M78%
Total CashN/A144M-
Total Debt53M64.8M82%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCB vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
CCB
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7452
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
656
SMR RATING
1..100
2016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2583
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFBS's Valuation (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCB (92). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (56). This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCB (20). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (61). This means that CCB’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (83). This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCBSFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KMKCX73.211.29
+1.79%
Kinetics Market Opportunities Adv C
NBMRX27.210.04
+0.15%
Neuberger M/C Intrinsic Val R6
FIWCX12.90N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI International Value Index
SINAX40.20-0.05
-0.12%
ClearBridge Large Cap Value A
DDIIX15.81-0.02
-0.13%
Nomura Wealth Builder Institutional

CCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCB has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCB jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCB
1D Price
Change %
CCB100%
-0.02%
TRMK - CCB
69%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
SBCF - CCB
66%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
FNB - CCB
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
ASB - CCB
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
FHB - CCB
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
More

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
+0.41%
UCB - SFBS
86%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
TRMK - SFBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
SBCF - SFBS
85%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
SFNC - SFBS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
UMBF - SFBS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
More