CCB
Price
$110.65
Change
+$0.61 (+0.55%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.66B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBS
Price
$71.77
Change
+$0.11 (+0.15%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.92B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCB vs SFBS

Header iconCCB vs SFBS Comparison
Open Charts CCB vs SFBSBanner chart's image
Coastal Financial
Price$110.65
Change+$0.61 (+0.55%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization1.66B
ServisFirst Bancshares
Price$71.77
Change+$0.11 (+0.15%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization3.92B
CCB vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
CCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCB vs. SFBS commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCB is a StrongBuy and SFBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CCB: $110.04 vs. SFBS: $71.66)
Brand notoriety: CCB and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCB: 93% vs. SFBS: 94%
Market capitalization -- CCB: $1.68B vs. SFBS: $3.92B
CCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.68B. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCB is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCB is a better buy in the short-term than SFBS.

Price Growth

CCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCB is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($3.92B) has a higher market cap than CCB($1.66B). CCB has higher P/E ratio than SFBS: CCB (34.60) vs SFBS (15.36). CCB YTD gains are higher at: 29.596 vs. SFBS (-14.026). CCB has less debt than SFBS: CCB (53M) vs SFBS (64.7M). SFBS has higher revenues than CCB: SFBS (516M) vs CCB (416M).
CCBSFBSCCB / SFBS
Capitalization1.66B3.92B42%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.596-14.026-211%
P/E Ratio34.6015.36225%
Revenue416M516M81%
Total CashN/A141M-
Total Debt53M64.7M82%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCB vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
CCB
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
455
SMR RATING
1..100
2116
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1587
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5040

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFBS's Valuation (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCB (91). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (55). This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCB (21). This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (62). This means that CCB’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFBS (87). This means that CCB’s stock grew significantly faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCBSFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIJCX85.640.62
+0.73%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples Z
CHAIX18.840.07
+0.37%
Chase Growth Institutional
PREIX180.420.54
+0.30%
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500
PMVRX19.560.05
+0.26%
Putnam Sustainable Future R
JDURX16.75-0.03
-0.18%
PGIM Jennison Utility R

CCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCB has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCB jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCB
1D Price
Change %
CCB100%
+2.39%
TRMK - CCB
69%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
SBCF - CCB
66%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
FNB - CCB
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
BY - CCB
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
SFBS - CCB
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
+1.21%
TRMK - SFBS
87%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
UCB - SFBS
87%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
UBSI - SFBS
87%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
WSFS - SFBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
HWC - SFBS
86%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
More