CCB
Price
$116.32
Change
-$0.68 (-0.58%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.76B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBCF
Price
$32.49
Change
+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.18B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCB vs SBCF

Header iconCCB vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts CCB vs SBCFBanner chart's image
Coastal Financial
Price$116.32
Change-$0.68 (-0.58%)
Volume$32.1K
Capitalization1.76B
Seacoast Banking
Price$32.49
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Volume$264K
Capitalization3.18B
CCB vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
CCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCB vs. SBCF commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCB is a StrongBuy and SBCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CCB: $116.32 vs. SBCF: $32.49)
Brand notoriety: CCB and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCB: 29% vs. SBCF: 38%
Market capitalization -- CCB: $1.76B vs. SBCF: $3.18B
CCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.76B. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCB is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCB is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

CCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCB is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($3.18B) has a higher market cap than CCB($1.76B). CCB has higher P/E ratio than SBCF: CCB (36.58) vs SBCF (19.34). CCB YTD gains are higher at: 36.992 vs. SBCF (20.395). CCB has less debt than SBCF: CCB (53M) vs SBCF (797M). SBCF has higher revenues than CCB: SBCF (582M) vs CCB (410M).
CCBSBCFCCB / SBCF
Capitalization1.76B3.18B55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.99220.395181%
P/E Ratio36.5819.34189%
Revenue410M582M70%
Total CashN/A182M-
Total Debt53M797M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCB vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
CCB
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8667
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
467
SMR RATING
1..100
2118
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2055
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5029

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBCF's Valuation (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCB (92). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (67). This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCB (21). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (46). This means that CCB’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (55). This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCBSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IREIX13.220.09
+0.69%
Nomura Real Estate Securities I
MLVRX17.900.06
+0.34%
MFS Low Volatility Equity R4
APGAX98.440.22
+0.22%
AB Large Cap Growth A
JSGCX26.600.03
+0.11%
JHancock U.S. Growth C
GSICX29.430.01
+0.03%
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG C

CCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCB has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCB jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCB
1D Price
Change %
CCB100%
-0.58%
TRMK - CCB
68%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
SBCF - CCB
66%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
FNB - CCB
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
ASB - CCB
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
FHB - CCB
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
+0.12%
TRMK - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
UCB - SBCF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
UBSI - SBCF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
ABCB - SBCF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
AUB - SBCF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
More