CCB
Price
$110.65
Change
+$0.61 (+0.55%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.66B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBCF
Price
$32.61
Change
+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.19B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCB vs SBCF

Header iconCCB vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts CCB vs SBCFBanner chart's image
Coastal Financial
Price$110.65
Change+$0.61 (+0.55%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization1.66B
Seacoast Banking
Price$32.61
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$558
Capitalization3.19B
CCB vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
CCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCB vs. SBCF commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCB is a StrongBuy and SBCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CCB: $110.04 vs. SBCF: $32.56)
Brand notoriety: CCB and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCB: 93% vs. SBCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CCB: $1.66B vs. SBCF: $3.19B
CCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.66B. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCB is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the short-term than CCB.

Price Growth

CCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCB is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($3.19B) has a higher market cap than CCB($1.66B). CCB has higher P/E ratio than SBCF: CCB (34.60) vs SBCF (19.38). CCB YTD gains are higher at: 29.596 vs. SBCF (20.655). CCB has less debt than SBCF: CCB (53M) vs SBCF (822M). SBCF has higher revenues than CCB: SBCF (555M) vs CCB (416M).
CCBSBCFCCB / SBCF
Capitalization1.66B3.19B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.59620.655143%
P/E Ratio34.6019.38179%
Revenue416M555M75%
Total CashN/A182M-
Total Debt53M822M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCB vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
CCB
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2729
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
455
SMR RATING
1..100
2118
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1558
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5019

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBCF's Valuation (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCB (91). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (55). This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCB (21). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (47). This means that CCB’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

CCB's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (58). This means that CCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCBSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABASX21.460.28
+1.32%
AB Discovery Value A
CCTRX13.770.17
+1.25%
Columbia Sm Cp Val and Inflection R
IACIX11.130.11
+1.00%
VY® American Century Sm-Mid Cp Val I
VPKIX17.210.03
+0.17%
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Instl
OBCHX9.54-0.07
-0.73%
Oberweis China Opportunities

CCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCB has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCB jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCB
1D Price
Change %
CCB100%
+2.39%
TRMK - CCB
69%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
SBCF - CCB
66%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
FNB - CCB
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
BY - CCB
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
SFBS - CCB
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
+2.33%
TRMK - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
UBSI - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
UCB - SBCF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
ABCB - SBCF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
AUB - SBCF
87%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
More