Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCALX vs NRGSX
CCALX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CCALX vs NRGSX
Conestoga Small Cap Institutional
Price$71.93
Change+$0.45 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.42B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.48
Change+$0.48 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.83B
CCALX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCALX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCALX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.83B vs. CCALX (3.42B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CCALX: NRGSX (0.06) vs CCALX (0.00). CCALX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CCALX (11 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CCALX (0.99) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CCALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCALX: NRGSX (0) vs CCALX (250000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.97 vs. CCALX (-7.59). CCALX return over 5 years is better than : 16.30 vs. NRGSX (7.76).
| CCALX | NRGSX | CCALX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.74 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.74 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.522 | -2.862 | 333% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.42B | 8.83B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.59 | -6.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 12.34 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.30 | 7.76 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.30 | 17.91 | 660% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement