CC
Price
$12.93
Change
+$0.20 (+1.57%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.91B
18 days until earnings call
SQM
Price
$37.15
Change
-$0.29 (-0.77%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.99B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CC vs SQM

Header iconCC vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts CC vs SQMBanner chart's image
Chemours Company (The)
Price$12.93
Change+$0.20 (+1.57%)
Volume$3.22M
Capitalization3.91B
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$37.15
Change-$0.29 (-0.77%)
Volume$921.19K
Capitalization13.99B
CC vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CC vs. SQM commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CC is a Hold and SQM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CC: $12.93 vs. SQM: $37.15)
Brand notoriety: CC: Notable vs. SQM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CC: 73% vs. SQM: 95%
Market capitalization -- CC: $3.91B vs. SQM: $13.99B
CC [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $3.91B. SQM’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $13.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSQM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SQM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CC is a better buy in the long-term than SQM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SQM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CC and SQM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CC (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +10.70% price change this week, while SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +5.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

SQM is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+3.00% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQM($14B) has a higher market cap than CC($3.91B). CC has higher P/E ratio than SQM: CC (11.93) vs SQM (6.95). SQM YTD gains are higher at: 2.173 vs. CC (-21.590). SQM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.94B vs. CC (197M). SQM has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. CC (1.2B). CC (4.3B) and SQM (4.49B) have identical debt. SQM has higher revenues than CC: SQM (7.47B) vs CC (6.03B).
CCSQMCC / SQM
Capitalization3.91B14B28%
EBITDA197M2.94B7%
Gain YTD-21.5902.173-994%
P/E Ratio11.936.95172%
Revenue6.03B7.47B81%
Total Cash1.2B2.36B51%
Total Debt4.3B4.49B96%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CC vs SQM: Fundamental Ratings
CC
SQM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5037
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10080
SMR RATING
1..100
8461
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
593
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CC's Valuation (16) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for SQM (83) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CC’s stock grew significantly faster than SQM’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CC (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to CC’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's SMR Rating (61) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CC (84) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to CC’s over the last 12 months.

CC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SQM (50) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CC’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.

CC's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for SQM (93) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CC’s stock grew significantly faster than SQM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCSQM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPU23.670.20
+0.85%
Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares
IVVM32.650.21
+0.65%
iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF
FFGX28.780.07
+0.25%
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
IBTF23.300.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Tr ETF
BBLB82.46-0.47
-0.57%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd20+YrETF

SQM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQM
1D Price
Change %
SQM100%
-0.77%
ALB - SQM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
DOW - SQM
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
CC - SQM
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
DD - SQM
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
LYB - SQM
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
More