CBZ vs MMS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBZ is a Hold and MMS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CBZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CBZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -3.29% price change this week, while MMS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -2.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
MMS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.58% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| CBZ | MMS | CBZ / MMS | |
| Capitalization | 3.93B | 5.12B | 77% |
| EBITDA | 223M | 472M | 47% |
| Gain YTD | 2.603 | -11.192 | -23% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.58 | 27.27 | 119% |
| Revenue | 1.59B | 4.98B | 32% |
| Total Cash | 8.09M | 104M | 8% |
| Total Debt | 551M | 1.48B | 37% |
CBZ | MMS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MMS's Valuation (24) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBZ (89). This means that MMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBZ’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMS (100). This means that CBZ’s stock grew significantly faster than MMS’s over the last 12 months.
MMS's SMR Rating (52) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CBZ (58). This means that MMS’s stock grew similarly to CBZ’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMS (83). This means that CBZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMS’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMS (94). This means that CBZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMS’s over the last 12 months.
| CBZ | MMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 57% |
CBZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBZ has been loosely correlated with VRSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBZ jumps, then VRSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBZ | 100% | -1.78% | ||
| VRSK - CBZ | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| QUAD - CBZ | 41% Loosely correlated | -8.41% | ||
| BCO - CBZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| ALLE - CBZ | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| STRA - CBZ | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
More | ||||
MMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMS has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMS jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMS | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| GHC - MMS | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| EFX - MMS | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| ICFI - MMS | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| ALLE - MMS | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| CBZ - MMS | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||