CBYDF
Price
$10.13
Change
-$0.20 (-1.94%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
324.94M
TBVPY
Price
$36.03
Change
-$1.71 (-4.53%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBYDF vs TBVPY

Header iconCBYDF vs TBVPY Comparison
Open Charts CBYDF vs TBVPYBanner chart's image
Corby Spirit and Wine
Price$10.13
Change-$0.20 (-1.94%)
Volume$100
Capitalization324.94M
Thai Beverage Public
Price$36.03
Change-$1.71 (-4.53%)
Volume$311
Capitalization11.42B
CBYDF vs TBVPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBYDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBVPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBYDF vs. TBVPY commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBYDF is a Hold and TBVPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CBYDF: $10.13 vs. TBVPY: $36.03)
Brand notoriety: CBYDF and TBVPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBYDF: 45% vs. TBVPY: 62%
Market capitalization -- CBYDF: $324.94M vs. TBVPY: $11.42B
CBYDF [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $324.94M. TBVPY’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $11.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBYDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBVPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBYDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBVPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBYDF and TBVPY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBYDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBVPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBYDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TBVPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CBYDF and TBVPY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CBYDF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while TBVPY (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+1.12% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBVPY($11.4B) has a higher market cap than CBYDF($325M). CBYDF has higher P/E ratio than TBVPY: CBYDF (18.94) vs TBVPY (12.95). TBVPY YTD gains are higher at: 19.426 vs. CBYDF (16.303). TBVPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 53.5B vs. CBYDF (47.4M). TBVPY has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. CBYDF (46M). CBYDF has less debt than TBVPY: CBYDF (3.65M) vs TBVPY (211B). TBVPY has higher revenues than CBYDF: TBVPY (278B) vs CBYDF (160M).
CBYDFTBVPYCBYDF / TBVPY
Capitalization325M11.4B3%
EBITDA47.4M53.5B0%
Gain YTD16.30319.42684%
P/E Ratio18.9412.95146%
Revenue160M278B0%
Total Cash46M45.4B0%
Total Debt3.65M211B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBYDF vs TBVPY: Fundamental Ratings
CBYDF
TBVPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5654
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7168
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBYDF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as TBVPY (12). This means that CBYDF’s stock grew similarly to TBVPY’s over the last 12 months.

CBYDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TBVPY (100). This means that CBYDF’s stock grew similarly to TBVPY’s over the last 12 months.

TBVPY's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CBYDF (56). This means that TBVPY’s stock grew similarly to CBYDF’s over the last 12 months.

TBVPY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CBYDF (50). This means that TBVPY’s stock grew similarly to CBYDF’s over the last 12 months.

TBVPY's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CBYDF (71). This means that TBVPY’s stock grew similarly to CBYDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBYDFTBVPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBYDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBVPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHK104.901.55
+1.50%
Mohawk Industries
INEO1.24-0.02
-1.59%
INNEOVA Holdings Limited
CDLR20.31-0.46
-2.21%
Cadeler A/S American Depositary Share (each representing four (4)
NYXH7.47-0.21
-2.73%
Nyxoah SA
MKTW18.95-0.85
-4.29%
MarketWise Inc

CBYDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBYDF and KNBWF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBYDF and KNBWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBYDF
1D Price
Change %
CBYDF100%
N/A
KNBWF - CBYDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBVPY - CBYDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CABGY - CBYDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
DVDCF - CBYDF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
CABJF - CBYDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
More

TBVPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBVPY has been loosely correlated with KNBWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBVPY jumps, then KNBWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBVPY
1D Price
Change %
TBVPY100%
N/A
KNBWF - TBVPY
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CABGY - TBVPY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
FMXUF - TBVPY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBYDF - TBVPY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNBWY - TBVPY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More