CBVTF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.08 (+800.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.68M
ZPHRF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
80.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBVTF vs ZPHRF

Header iconCBVTF vs ZPHRF Comparison
Open Charts CBVTF vs ZPHRFBanner chart's image
Cobra Venture
Price$0.09
Change+$0.08 (+800.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.68M
ZEPHYR ENERGY
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.3K
Capitalization80.49M
CBVTF vs ZPHRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ZPHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBVTF vs. ZPHRF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVTF is a Hold and ZPHRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CBVTF: $0.09 vs. ZPHRF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: CBVTF and ZPHRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBVTF: 100% vs. ZPHRF: 78%
Market capitalization -- CBVTF: $1.68M vs. ZPHRF: $80.49M
CBVTF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.68M. ZPHRF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $80.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBVTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZPHRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZPHRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBVTF is a better buy in the long-term than ZPHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZPHRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZPHRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CBVTF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZPHRF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +17.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZPHRF($80.5M) has a higher market cap than CBVTF($1.68M). CBVTF YTD gains are higher at: 620.000 vs. ZPHRF (-0.513). CBVTF has more cash in the bank: 2.25M vs. ZPHRF (1.94M).
CBVTFZPHRFCBVTF / ZPHRF
Capitalization1.68M80.5M2%
EBITDA91.5KN/A-
Gain YTD620.000-0.513-120,914%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.23MN/A-
Total Cash2.25M1.94M115%
Total DebtN/A35.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBVTF vs ZPHRF: Fundamental Ratings
CBVTF
ZPHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7969
SMR RATING
1..100
9521
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBVTF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPHRF (66). This means that CBVTF’s stock grew similarly to ZPHRF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPHRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CBVTF (79). This means that ZPHRF’s stock grew similarly to CBVTF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPHRF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBVTF (95). This means that ZPHRF’s stock grew significantly faster than CBVTF’s over the last 12 months.

CBVTF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPHRF (59). This means that CBVTF’s stock grew similarly to ZPHRF’s over the last 12 months.

CBVTF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPHRF (100). This means that CBVTF’s stock grew similarly to ZPHRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBVTFZPHRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ZPHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAU2.540.16
+6.72%
Galiano Gold
DLTR101.120.87
+0.87%
Dollar Tree
GEF61.37-0.03
-0.05%
Greif
ZNTL1.75-0.02
-1.13%
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals
NUAI0.38-0.03
-6.96%
New Era Helium Inc

CBVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBVTF has been loosely correlated with GEGYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBVTF jumps, then GEGYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBVTF
1D Price
Change %
CBVTF100%
N/A
GEGYF - CBVTF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZPHRF - CBVTF
26%
Poorly correlated
+17.18%
ROKRF - CBVTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.25%
EERGF - CBVTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNNEF - CBVTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
More

ZPHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZPHRF and CBVTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZPHRF and CBVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPHRF
1D Price
Change %
ZPHRF100%
+17.18%
CBVTF - ZPHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTVRF - ZPHRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TPET - ZPHRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
PTRRY - ZPHRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NZERF - ZPHRF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More