CBVTF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.08 (+800.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.56M
ROKRF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
52.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBVTF vs ROKRF

Header iconCBVTF vs ROKRF Comparison
Open Charts CBVTF vs ROKRFBanner chart's image
Cobra Venture
Price$0.09
Change+$0.08 (+800.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization1.56M
ROK Resources
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$62.5K
Capitalization52.93M
CBVTF vs ROKRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROKRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBVTF vs. ROKRF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBVTF is a Hold and ROKRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CBVTF: $0.09 vs. ROKRF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CBVTF and ROKRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBVTF: 174% vs. ROKRF: 127%
Market capitalization -- CBVTF: $1.56M vs. ROKRF: $52.93M
CBVTF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.56M. ROKRF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $52.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBVTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileROKRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ROKRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ROKRF is a better buy in the long-term than CBVTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBVTF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROKRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBVTF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ROKRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CBVTF and ROKRF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CBVTF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ROKRF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.15% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ROKRF($52.9M) has a higher market cap than CBVTF($1.56M). CBVTF YTD gains are higher at: 620.000 vs. ROKRF (15.745). CBVTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15K vs. ROKRF (-24.71M). ROKRF has more cash in the bank: 5.72M vs. CBVTF (1.62M). CBVTF has less debt than ROKRF: CBVTF (0) vs ROKRF (20.6M). ROKRF has higher revenues than CBVTF: ROKRF (103M) vs CBVTF (878K).
CBVTFROKRFCBVTF / ROKRF
Capitalization1.56M52.9M3%
EBITDA15K-24.71M-0%
Gain YTD620.00015.7453,938%
P/E RatioN/A0.84-
Revenue878K103M1%
Total Cash1.62M5.72M28%
Total Debt020.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBVTF vs ROKRF: Fundamental Ratings
CBVTF
ROKRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7680
SMR RATING
1..100
10086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10064
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBVTF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as ROKRF (58). This means that CBVTF’s stock grew similarly to ROKRF’s over the last 12 months.

CBVTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as ROKRF (80). This means that CBVTF’s stock grew similarly to ROKRF’s over the last 12 months.

ROKRF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CBVTF (100). This means that ROKRF’s stock grew similarly to CBVTF’s over the last 12 months.

CBVTF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ROKRF (48). This means that CBVTF’s stock grew similarly to ROKRF’s over the last 12 months.

ROKRF's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBVTF (100). This means that ROKRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBVTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBVTFROKRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROKRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPOW0.950.03
+3.80%
Sunrise New Energy Co Ltd
EOSE5.080.18
+3.67%
Eos Energy Enterprises
MAIN61.130.97
+1.61%
Main Street Capital Corp
YUM150.00-0.37
-0.25%
Yum! Brands
MSEX55.57-0.32
-0.57%
Middlesex Water Company

CBVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBVTF has been loosely correlated with GEGYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBVTF jumps, then GEGYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBVTF
1D Price
Change %
CBVTF100%
N/A
GEGYF - CBVTF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZPHRF - CBVTF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROKRF - CBVTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
EERGF - CBVTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNNEF - CBVTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
More

ROKRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROKRF has been loosely correlated with SPGYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROKRF jumps, then SPGYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROKRF
1D Price
Change %
ROKRF100%
-0.13%
SPGYF - ROKRF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
TAOIF - ROKRF
33%
Loosely correlated
+11.43%
PEYUF - ROKRF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
MEGEF - ROKRF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
BNEFF - ROKRF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More