CBUMF
Price
$0.72
Change
+$0.17 (+30.91%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.98B
RETO
Price
$1.88
Change
+$0.04 (+2.17%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBUMF vs RETO

Header iconCBUMF vs RETO Comparison
Open Charts CBUMF vs RETOBanner chart's image
China National Buildings Material
Price$0.72
Change+$0.17 (+30.91%)
Volume$157
Capitalization4.98B
ReTo Eco-Solutions
Price$1.88
Change+$0.04 (+2.17%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization15.33M
CBUMF vs RETO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RETO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBUMF vs. RETO commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBUMF is a Hold and RETO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CBUMF: $0.72 vs. RETO: $1.84)
Brand notoriety: CBUMF and RETO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBUMF: 15% vs. RETO: 52%
Market capitalization -- CBUMF: $4.98B vs. RETO: $15.33M
CBUMF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $4.98B. RETO’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $15.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBUMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRETO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBUMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RETO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBUMF is a better buy in the long-term than RETO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBUMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RETO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBUMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RETO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RETO is a better buy in the short-term than CBUMF.

Price Growth

CBUMF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RETO (@Construction Materials) price change was -3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.50% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBUMF($4.98B) has a higher market cap than RETO($15.3M). CBUMF has higher P/E ratio than RETO: CBUMF (7.43) vs RETO (0.39). CBUMF YTD gains are higher at: 67.894 vs. RETO (-79.310).
CBUMFRETOCBUMF / RETO
Capitalization4.98B15.3M32,569%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD67.894-79.310-86%
P/E Ratio7.430.391,919%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A9.11M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBUMF vs RETO: Fundamental Ratings
CBUMF
RETO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
63100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3795
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBUMF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RETO (74) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CBUMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RETO (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to RETO’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RETO (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CBUMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RETO (95) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CBUMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

RETO's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as CBUMF (100) in the null industry. This means that RETO’s stock grew similarly to CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBUMFRETO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RETO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URNM51.790.69
+1.35%
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
RYLG22.440.09
+0.39%
Global X Russell 2000 Cov Cl & Gr ETF
JULP29.70-0.01
-0.05%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jul
IAE7.15-0.01
-0.14%
VOYA ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY Income FUND
RSPF77.38-1.23
-1.56%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF

CBUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBUMF and JHX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBUMF and JHX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBUMF
1D Price
Change %
CBUMF100%
N/A
JHX - CBUMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
CBUMY - CBUMF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
RETO - CBUMF
12%
Poorly correlated
+14.70%
TGLS - CBUMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
BZZUY - CBUMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More

RETO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RETO and CBUMF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RETO and CBUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RETO
1D Price
Change %
RETO100%
+14.70%
CBUMF - RETO
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAPT - RETO
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
BZZUY - RETO
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
CARCY - RETO
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - RETO
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More