CBUMF
Price
$0.72
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.14B
CBUMY
Price
$30.41
Change
-$5.10 (-14.36%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBUMF vs CBUMY

Header iconCBUMF vs CBUMY Comparison
Open Charts CBUMF vs CBUMYBanner chart's image
China National Buildings Material
Price$0.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization5.14B
China National Buildings Material
Price$30.41
Change-$5.10 (-14.36%)
Volume$107
Capitalization5.14B
CBUMF vs CBUMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBUMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBUMF vs. CBUMY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBUMF is a Hold and CBUMY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CBUMF: $0.72 vs. CBUMY: $30.41)
Brand notoriety: CBUMF and CBUMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBUMF: 157% vs. CBUMY: 39%
Market capitalization -- CBUMF: $5.14B vs. CBUMY: $5.14B
CBUMF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $5.14B. CBUMY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $5.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBUMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBUMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBUMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CBUMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBUMF and CBUMY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBUMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBUMY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBUMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CBUMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBUMF is a better buy in the short-term than CBUMY.

Price Growth

CBUMF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CBUMY (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.60% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBUMF($5.14B) and CBUMY($5.14B) have the same market capitalization . CBUMF has higher P/E ratio than CBUMY: CBUMF (7.42) vs CBUMY (6.25). CBUMF YTD gains are higher at: 67.977 vs. CBUMY (40.234). CBUMF (19.3B) and CBUMY (19.3B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CBUMF (30.7B) and CBUMY (30.7B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CBUMF (208B) and CBUMY (208B) have identical debt. CBUMF (181B) and CBUMY (181B) have equivalent revenues.
CBUMFCBUMYCBUMF / CBUMY
Capitalization5.14B5.14B100%
EBITDA19.3B19.3B100%
Gain YTD67.97740.234169%
P/E Ratio7.426.25119%
Revenue181B181B100%
Total Cash30.7B30.7B100%
Total Debt208B208B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBUMF vs CBUMY: Fundamental Ratings
CBUMF
CBUMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBUMY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CBUMF (9). This means that CBUMY’s stock grew similarly to CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBUMF (100). This means that CBUMY’s stock grew similarly to CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBUMF (100). This means that CBUMY’s stock grew similarly to CBUMF’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CBUMY (44). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to CBUMY’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBUMY (100). This means that CBUMF’s stock grew similarly to CBUMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBUMFCBUMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBUMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACES32.150.26
+0.83%
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
EELV26.510.17
+0.66%
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Vol ETF
KOMP61.850.36
+0.59%
SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Comps ETF
CSHP99.72N/A
N/A
iShares Enhanced ST Bond Active ETF
DWSH6.89-0.07
-1.00%
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF

CBUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBUMF and JHX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBUMF and JHX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBUMF
1D Price
Change %
CBUMF100%
N/A
JHX - CBUMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
CBUMY - CBUMF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RETO - CBUMF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
TGLS - CBUMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
BZZUY - CBUMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CBUMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBUMY has been loosely correlated with AHCHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBUMY jumps, then AHCHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBUMY
1D Price
Change %
CBUMY100%
N/A
AHCHY - CBUMY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
XYIGY - CBUMY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AHCHF - CBUMY
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBUMF - CBUMY
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTOY - CBUMY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More