CBT
Price
$109.18
Change
-$1.77 (-1.60%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
87 days until earnings call
TYNPF
Price
$29.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

CBT vs TYNPF

Header iconCBT vs TYNPF Comparison
Open Charts CBT vs TYNPFBanner chart's image
Cabot
Price$109.18
Change-$1.77 (-1.60%)
Volume$340.45K
CapitalizationN/A
Nippon Sanso Holdings
Price$29.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$324
CapitalizationN/A
CBT vs TYNPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBT vs. TYNPF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBT is a Hold and TYNPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CBT: $109.18 vs. TYNPF: $29.88)
Brand notoriety: CBT and TYNPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBT: 91% vs. TYNPF: 51%
Market capitalization -- CBT: $5.11B vs. TYNPF: $10.55B
CBT [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $5.11B. TYNPF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $10.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTYNPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TYNPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBT is a better buy in the long-term than TYNPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CBT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CBT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -6.36% price change this week, while TYNPF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -10.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBT is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.21% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYNPF($10.6B) has a higher market cap than CBT($5.11B). TYNPF has higher P/E ratio than CBT: TYNPF (20.28) vs CBT (12.08). CBT YTD gains are higher at: 32.501 vs. TYNPF (11.236). TYNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 227B vs. CBT (701M). TYNPF has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. CBT (244M). CBT has less debt than TYNPF: CBT (1.31B) vs TYNPF (900B). TYNPF has higher revenues than CBT: TYNPF (1.19T) vs CBT (3.92B).
CBTTYNPFCBT / TYNPF
Capitalization5.11B10.6B48%
EBITDA701M227B0%
Gain YTD32.50111.236289%
P/E Ratio12.0820.2860%
Revenue3.92B1.19T0%
Total Cash244M155B0%
Total Debt1.31B900B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBT: Fundamental Ratings
CBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
59
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
26
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBT has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBT jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBT
1D Price
Change %
CBT100%
-1.60%
AVNT - CBT
75%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
WLK - CBT
70%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
OEC - CBT
69%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
FUL - CBT
67%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
DOW - CBT
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
More

TYNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TYNPF has been loosely correlated with CBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TYNPF jumps, then CBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYNPF
1D Price
Change %
TYNPF100%
N/A
CBT - TYNPF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
ASGLY - TYNPF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
OEC - TYNPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
TROX - TYNPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
SKFOF - TYNPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More