CBT
Price
$77.23
Change
+$1.72 (+2.28%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.11B
43 days until earnings call
TYNPF
Price
$38.18
Change
+$0.13 (+0.34%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
15.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBT vs TYNPF

Header iconCBT vs TYNPF Comparison
Open Charts CBT vs TYNPFBanner chart's image
Cabot
Price$77.23
Change+$1.72 (+2.28%)
Volume$340.9K
Capitalization4.11B
Nippon Sanso Holdings
Price$38.18
Change+$0.13 (+0.34%)
Volume$1.63K
Capitalization15.76B
CBT vs TYNPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TYNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBT vs. TYNPF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBT is a Buy and TYNPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CBT: $77.23 vs. TYNPF: $38.18)
Brand notoriety: CBT and TYNPF are both not notable
CBT represents the Chemicals: Specialty, while TYNPF is part of the Chemicals: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBT: 92% vs. TYNPF: 157%
Market capitalization -- CBT: $4.11B vs. TYNPF: $15.76B
CBT [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.11B. TYNPF’s [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $15.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $222.46B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $60.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry is $7.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTYNPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TYNPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBT is a better buy in the long-term than TYNPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TYNPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TYNPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TYNPF is a better buy in the short-term than CBT.

Price Growth

CBT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while TYNPF (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -3.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.69%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBT is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.69% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-1.80% weekly)

The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYNPF($15.8B) has a higher market cap than CBT($4.11B). TYNPF has higher P/E ratio than CBT: TYNPF (24.89) vs CBT (10.11). TYNPF YTD gains are higher at: 30.738 vs. CBT (-14.007). TYNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 292B vs. CBT (811M). TYNPF has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. CBT (239M). CBT has less debt than TYNPF: CBT (1.22B) vs TYNPF (872B). TYNPF has higher revenues than CBT: TYNPF (1.29T) vs CBT (3.82B).
CBTTYNPFCBT / TYNPF
Capitalization4.11B15.8B26%
EBITDA811M292B0%
Gain YTD-14.00730.738-46%
P/E Ratio10.1124.8941%
Revenue3.82B1.29T0%
Total Cash239M150B0%
Total Debt1.22B872B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBT: Fundamental Ratings
CBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBTTYNPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TYNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNPYX128.702.51
+1.99%
Kinetics Paradigm Instl
DPRSX13.400.10
+0.75%
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets Inst
NNLEX24.720.17
+0.69%
Nicholas Limited Edition N
FSWFX74.970.28
+0.37%
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529-F-2
MRFGX24.450.08
+0.33%
BlackRock Capital Appreciation R

CBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBT has been closely correlated with IOSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBT jumps, then IOSP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBT
1D Price
Change %
CBT100%
+2.28%
IOSP - CBT
70%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
SCL - CBT
69%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
KWR - CBT
69%
Closely correlated
+3.12%
WLK - CBT
68%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
FUL - CBT
68%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
More

TYNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TYNPF has been loosely correlated with CBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TYNPF jumps, then CBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYNPF
1D Price
Change %
TYNPF100%
+0.34%
CBT - TYNPF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
ASGLY - TYNPF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
OEC - TYNPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
TROX - TYNPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.59%
SKFOF - TYNPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
More