CBT
Price
$74.72
Change
-$1.51 (-1.98%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.11B
57 days until earnings call
PRM
Price
$13.15
Change
-$0.28 (-2.08%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.08B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBT vs PRM

Header iconCBT vs PRM Comparison
Open Charts CBT vs PRMBanner chart's image
Cabot
Price$74.72
Change-$1.51 (-1.98%)
Volume$322.14K
Capitalization5.11B
Perimeter Solutions
Price$13.15
Change-$0.28 (-2.08%)
Volume$626.76K
Capitalization1.08B
CBT vs PRM Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBT vs. PRM commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBT is a StrongBuy and PRM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CBT: $74.72 vs. PRM: $13.15)
Brand notoriety: CBT and PRM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBT: 74% vs. PRM: 64%
Market capitalization -- CBT: $5.11B vs. PRM: $1.08B
CBT [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $5.11B. PRM’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBT is a better buy in the long-term than PRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBT is a better buy in the short-term than PRM.

Price Growth

CBT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.45% price change this week, while PRM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

PRM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.35% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBT($5.11B) has a higher market cap than PRM($1.08B). PRM has higher P/E ratio than CBT: PRM (18.56) vs CBT (12.08). PRM YTD gains are higher at: 2.895 vs. CBT (-17.259). CBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 701M vs. PRM (168M). CBT has more cash in the bank: 244M vs. PRM (52.8M). PRM has less debt than CBT: PRM (690M) vs CBT (1.31B). CBT has higher revenues than PRM: CBT (3.92B) vs PRM (322M).
CBTPRMCBT / PRM
Capitalization5.11B1.08B473%
EBITDA701M168M417%
Gain YTD-17.2592.895-596%
P/E Ratio12.0818.5665%
Revenue3.92B322M1,219%
Total Cash244M52.8M462%
Total Debt1.31B690M190%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBT: Fundamental Ratings
CBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBTPRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KAVA.X0.420573-0.004517
-1.06%
Kava cryptocurrency
FDMO72.42-0.84
-1.14%
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
BATT8.93-0.13
-1.48%
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
THNQ51.52-1.03
-1.97%
Robo Global® Artificial Intelligence ETF
PIXEL.X0.037874-0.001010
-2.60%
Pixels cryptocurrency

CBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBT has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBT jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBT
1D Price
Change %
CBT100%
-1.98%
AVNT - CBT
72%
Closely correlated
-3.98%
FUL - CBT
67%
Closely correlated
-3.42%
WLK - CBT
66%
Closely correlated
-1.68%
OEC - CBT
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.28%
IOSP - CBT
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
More

PRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRM has been loosely correlated with CBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRM jumps, then CBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRM
1D Price
Change %
PRM100%
-2.08%
CBT - PRM
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
WLK - PRM
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
MTX - PRM
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.37%
MATV - PRM
45%
Loosely correlated
-4.24%
FUL - PRM
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.42%
More