CBT
Price
$75.06
Change
+$0.11 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.11B
64 days until earnings call
FUL
Price
$56.18
Change
+$0.13 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBT vs FUL

Header iconCBT vs FUL Comparison
Open Charts CBT vs FULBanner chart's image
Cabot
Price$75.06
Change+$0.11 (+0.15%)
Volume$398.36K
Capitalization5.11B
HB Fuller
Price$56.18
Change+$0.13 (+0.23%)
Volume$215.84K
Capitalization4.35B
CBT vs FUL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBT vs. FUL commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBT is a StrongBuy and FUL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CBT: $74.38 vs. FUL: $55.67)
Brand notoriety: CBT and FUL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBT: 84% vs. FUL: 55%
Market capitalization -- CBT: $5.11B vs. FUL: $4.35B
CBT [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $5.11B. FUL’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBT is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBT is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

CBT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.54% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBT($5.11B) has a higher market cap than FUL($4.35B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than CBT: FUL (28.70) vs CBT (12.08). FUL YTD gains are higher at: -16.839 vs. CBT (-18.129). CBT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 701M vs. FUL (540M). CBT has more cash in the bank: 244M vs. FUL (165M). CBT has less debt than FUL: CBT (1.31B) vs FUL (1.83B). CBT has higher revenues than FUL: CBT (3.92B) vs FUL (3.51B).
CBTFULCBT / FUL
Capitalization5.11B4.35B118%
EBITDA701M540M130%
Gain YTD-18.129-16.839108%
P/E Ratio12.0828.7042%
Revenue3.92B3.51B112%
Total Cash244M165M148%
Total Debt1.31B1.83B72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBT vs FUL: Fundamental Ratings
CBT
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
553
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3856
SMR RATING
1..100
3280
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8055
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBT's Valuation (45) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (53). This means that CBT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

CBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FUL (56). This means that CBT’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

CBT's SMR Rating (32) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (80). This means that CBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CBT (81). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to CBT’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CBT (80). This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to CBT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBTFUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

CBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBT has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBT jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBT
1D Price
Change %
CBT100%
-2.41%
AVNT - CBT
72%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
FUL - CBT
67%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
WLK - CBT
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
OEC - CBT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
IOSP - CBT
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
More

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
-0.73%
KWR - FUL
74%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
RPM - FUL
74%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
SCL - FUL
73%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
AVNT - FUL
73%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
PPG - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
More