CBSH
Price
$54.56
Change
+$0.43 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.06B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FNBT
Price
$38.07
Change
-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
467.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBSH vs FNBT

Header iconCBSH vs FNBT Comparison
Open Charts CBSH vs FNBTBanner chart's image
Commerce Bancshares
Price$54.56
Change+$0.43 (+0.79%)
Volume$22.78K
Capitalization8.06B
FineMark Holdings
Price$38.07
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Volume$26K
Capitalization467.7M
CBSH vs FNBT Comparison Chart in %
CBSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FNBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBSH vs. FNBT commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBSH is a Hold and FNBT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CBSH: $54.13 vs. FNBT: $38.07)
Brand notoriety: CBSH and FNBT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBSH: 130% vs. FNBT: 121%
Market capitalization -- CBSH: $8.06B vs. FNBT: $467.7M
CBSH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.06B. FNBT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $467.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNBT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNBT is a better buy in the long-term than CBSH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBSH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNBT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBSH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNBT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CBSH and FNBT are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CBSH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while FNBT (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBSH is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBSH($8.06B) has a higher market cap than FNBT($468M). FNBT has higher P/E ratio than CBSH: FNBT (158.63) vs CBSH (13.57). CBSH YTD gains are higher at: 3.420 vs. FNBT (0.000). CBSH has less debt than FNBT: CBSH (9.27M) vs FNBT (394M). CBSH has higher revenues than FNBT: CBSH (1.74B) vs FNBT (85.3M).
CBSHFNBTCBSH / FNBT
Capitalization8.06B468M1,723%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.4200.000-
P/E Ratio13.57158.639%
Revenue1.74B85.3M2,039%
Total Cash476MN/A-
Total Debt9.27M394M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBSH vs FNBT: Fundamental Ratings
CBSH
FNBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7548
SMR RATING
1..100
1282
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7917
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBSH's Valuation (63) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNBT (100) in the null industry. This means that CBSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CBSH (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNBT’s stock grew similarly to CBSH’s over the last 12 months.

CBSH's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNBT (82) in the null industry. This means that CBSH’s stock grew significantly faster than FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CBSH (73) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNBT’s stock grew similarly to CBSH’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBSH (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBSH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBSHFNBT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FNBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X96929.3300001607.546900
+1.69%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.02N/A
N/A
GameStop Corp
AAPL259.96-1.09
-0.42%
Apple
SPY690.36-3.41
-0.49%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA439.20-8.00
-1.79%
Tesla

CBSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBSH has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBSH jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBSH
1D Price
Change %
CBSH100%
+1.46%
UBSI - CBSH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
HWC - CBSH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
UCB - CBSH
86%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
PB - CBSH
85%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
FNB - CBSH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More

FNBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNBT and RF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNBT and RF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNBT
1D Price
Change %
FNBT100%
N/A
RF - FNBT
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
CBSH - FNBT
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
VBNK - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
MCHT - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFB - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More