CBOE
Price
$243.52
Change
-$0.47 (-0.19%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
25.47B
33 days until earnings call
ICE
Price
$167.73
Change
+$0.45 (+0.27%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
96.01B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBOE vs ICE

Header iconCBOE vs ICE Comparison
Open Charts CBOE vs ICEBanner chart's image
Cboe Global Markets
Price$243.52
Change-$0.47 (-0.19%)
Volume$617.67K
Capitalization25.47B
Intercontinental Exchange
Price$167.73
Change+$0.45 (+0.27%)
Volume$2.56M
Capitalization96.01B
CBOE vs ICE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBOE vs. ICE commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBOE is a Buy and ICE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CBOE: $243.52 vs. ICE: $167.73)
Brand notoriety: CBOE and ICE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBOE: 68% vs. ICE: 87%
Market capitalization -- CBOE: $25.47B vs. ICE: $96.01B
CBOE [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $25.47B. ICE’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $96.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBOE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileICE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBOE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ICE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBOE is a better buy in the long-term than ICE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBOE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBOE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ICE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CBOE and ICE are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CBOE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +4.49% price change this week, while ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBOE is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

ICE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.63% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($96B) has a higher market cap than CBOE($25.5B). ICE has higher P/E ratio than CBOE: ICE (32.19) vs CBOE (28.58). CBOE YTD gains are higher at: 25.737 vs. ICE (13.499). CBOE has less debt than ICE: CBOE (1.6B) vs ICE (19.7B).
CBOEICECBOE / ICE
Capitalization25.5B96B27%
EBITDA1.45BN/A-
Gain YTD25.73713.499191%
P/E Ratio28.5832.1989%
Revenue4.53BN/A-
Total Cash1.46BN/A-
Total Debt1.6B19.7B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBOE vs ICE: Fundamental Ratings
CBOE
ICE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7351
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
231
SMR RATING
1..100
4468
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4670
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICE's Valuation (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBOE (71). This means that ICE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBOE’s over the last 12 months.

CBOE's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (31). This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

CBOE's SMR Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (68). This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

CBOE's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (61). This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

CBOE's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as ICE (70). This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBOEICE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBOE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMFL27.370.28
+1.03%
Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF
THIR31.160.11
+0.35%
THOR Index Rotation ETF
UJUN36.640.02
+0.05%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun
AUGZ42.73N/A
N/A
TrueShares Structured Outcome August ETF
CGCP22.77N/A
N/A
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF

CBOE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBOE has been loosely correlated with CME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBOE jumps, then CME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBOE
1D Price
Change %
CBOE100%
-0.19%
CME - CBOE
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
ICE - CBOE
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
TW - CBOE
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
MKTX - CBOE
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
SPGI - CBOE
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More

ICE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICE
1D Price
Change %
ICE100%
+0.27%
NDAQ - ICE
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
MCO - ICE
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
SPGI - ICE
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
MORN - ICE
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
TW - ICE
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
More