CBOBA
Price
$13.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
PDLB
Price
$12.78
Change
+$0.05 (+0.39%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CBOBA vs PDLB

Header iconCBOBA vs PDLB Comparison
Open Charts CBOBA vs PDLBBanner chart's image
Bay Community Ban
Price$13.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$38.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Ponce Financial Group
Price$12.78
Change+$0.05 (+0.39%)
Volume$32.51K
CapitalizationN/A
CBOBA vs PDLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
PDLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBOBA vs. PDLB commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBOBA is a Hold and PDLB is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CBOBA: $13.95 vs. PDLB: $12.78)
Brand notoriety: CBOBA and PDLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBOBA: 300% vs. PDLB: 62%
Market capitalization -- CBOBA: $71.02M vs. PDLB: $204.6M
CBOBA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $71.02M. PDLB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $204.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBOBA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePDLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBOBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PDLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBOBA is a better buy in the long-term than PDLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PDLB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PDLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CBOBA (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PDLB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

PDLB is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDLB($205M) has a higher market cap than CBOBA($71M). CBOBA YTD gains are higher at: 83.880 vs. PDLB (30.430). CBOBA has less debt than PDLB: CBOBA (3.57M) vs PDLB (717M). PDLB has higher revenues than CBOBA: PDLB (73.9M) vs CBOBA (3.93M).
CBOBAPDLBCBOBA / PDLB
Capitalization71M205M35%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD83.88030.430276%
P/E RatioN/A57.33-
Revenue3.93M73.9M5%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.57M717M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBOBA vs PDLB: Fundamental Ratings
CBOBA
PDLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
758
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5892
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PDLB's Valuation (66) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBOBA (87) in the null industry. This means that PDLB’s stock grew similarly to CBOBA’s over the last 12 months.

CBOBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDLB (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBOBA’s stock grew significantly faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

CBOBA's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDLB (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBOBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

CBOBA's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PDLB (39) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBOBA’s stock grew similarly to PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

CBOBA's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDLB (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBOBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PDLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PDLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

CBOBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBOBA has been loosely correlated with CHCJY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBOBA jumps, then CHCJY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBOBA
1D Price
Change %
CBOBA100%
N/A
CHCJY - CBOBA
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCZC - CBOBA
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
NWPP - CBOBA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBN - CBOBA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
PDLB - CBOBA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
More

PDLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDLB has been loosely correlated with CFB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDLB jumps, then CFB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDLB
1D Price
Change %
PDLB100%
-0.86%
CFB - PDLB
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
BLFY - PDLB
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
TCBI - PDLB
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
CARE - PDLB
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
CBSH - PDLB
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
More