Advertisement
CBMJ vs UNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBMJ is a Hold and UNF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBMJ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CBMJ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBMJ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBMJ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- UNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CBMJ (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +10.61% price change this week, while UNF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +0.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +149.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +173.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
UNF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-1.79% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.75% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| CBMJ | UNF | CBMJ / UNF | |
| Capitalization | 4.19M | 3.07B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -37.234 | -0.807 | 4,611% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 20.28 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 205K | 74.7M | 0% |
CBMJ | UNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UNF's Valuation (70) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CBMJ (80) in the null industry. This means that UNF’s stock grew similarly to CBMJ’s over the last 12 months.
UNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CBMJ (100) in the null industry. This means that UNF’s stock grew similarly to CBMJ’s over the last 12 months.
UNF's SMR Rating (79) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CBMJ (100) in the null industry. This means that UNF’s stock grew similarly to CBMJ’s over the last 12 months.
CBMJ's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNF (78) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CBMJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNF’s over the last 12 months.
CBMJ's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNF (81) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CBMJ’s stock grew significantly faster than UNF’s over the last 12 months.
| CBMJ | UNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
CBMJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CBMJ and UNF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBMJ and UNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBMJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBMJ | 100% | N/A | ||
| UNF - CBMJ | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.12% | ||
| BVRDF - CBMJ | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRWE - CBMJ | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BXBLY - CBMJ | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| COGNY - CBMJ | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
UNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNF has been loosely correlated with CTAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNF jumps, then CTAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNF | 100% | +2.12% | ||
| CTAS - UNF | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| LOPE - UNF | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| LTRE - UNF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CASS - UNF | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| BRC - UNF | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
More | ||||