Advertisement
CBMJ vs CNGO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBMJ is a Buy and CNGO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBMJ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNGO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CBMJ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CNGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBMJ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNGO’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBMJ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CNGO’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
CBMJ (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +33.00% price change this week, while CNGO (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.04%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.30%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (+2.51% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.54% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| CBMJ | CNGO | CBMJ / CNGO | |
| Capitalization | 6.83M | 1.47B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 249M | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.340 | 20.513 | 133% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 1.48B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 256M | - |
| Total Debt | 205K | 1.67B | 0% |
CBMJ | CNGO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBMJ's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CNGO (82). This means that CBMJ’s stock grew similarly to CNGO’s over the last 12 months.
CNGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBMJ (96). This means that CNGO’s stock grew significantly faster than CBMJ’s over the last 12 months.
CNGO's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBMJ (100). This means that CNGO’s stock grew similarly to CBMJ’s over the last 12 months.
CBMJ's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CNGO (47). This means that CBMJ’s stock grew similarly to CNGO’s over the last 12 months.
CBMJ's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNGO (70). This means that CBMJ’s stock grew significantly faster than CNGO’s over the last 12 months.
| CBMJ | CNGO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 21% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 36% |
Advertisement
CBMJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CBMJ and UNF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBMJ and UNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBMJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBMJ | 100% | +28.13% | ||
| UNF - CBMJ | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| BVRDF - CBMJ | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRWE - CBMJ | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BXBLY - CBMJ | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| COGNY - CBMJ | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
CNGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNGO and WTLLF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNGO and WTLLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| WTLLF - CNGO | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RTO - CNGO | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| STGXF - CNGO | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BSEFY - CNGO | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CBMJ - CNGO | 2% Poorly correlated | +28.13% | ||
More | ||||