CBLUF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.38B
SNFRF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.06 (-27.27%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBLUF vs SNFRF

Header iconCBLUF vs SNFRF Comparison
Open Charts CBLUF vs SNFRFBanner chart's image
China Bluechemical
Price$0.30
Change-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Volume$40K
Capitalization1.38B
Sinofert Holdings
Price$0.16
Change-$0.06 (-27.27%)
Volume$5.02K
Capitalization1.27B
CBLUF vs SNFRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBLUF vs. SNFRF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLUF is a Hold and SNFRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CBLUF: $0.30 vs. SNFRF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: CBLUF and SNFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBLUF: 371% vs. SNFRF: 91%
Market capitalization -- CBLUF: $1.38B vs. SNFRF: $1.27B
CBLUF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $1.38B. SNFRF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $1.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $49.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBLUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNFRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBLUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNFRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBLUF and SNFRF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBLUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNFRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBLUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SNFRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBLUF is a better buy in the short-term than SNFRF.

Price Growth

CBLUF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNFRF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (-1.68% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBLUF($1.38B) has a higher market cap than SNFRF($1.27B). CBLUF has higher P/E ratio than SNFRF: CBLUF (9.74) vs SNFRF (7.41). SNFRF YTD gains are higher at: 17.320 vs. CBLUF (10.701).
CBLUFSNFRFCBLUF / SNFRF
Capitalization1.38B1.27B109%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.70117.32062%
P/E Ratio9.747.41131%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBLUF vs SNFRF: Fundamental Ratings
CBLUF
SNFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5042
SMR RATING
1..100
7058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1379
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBLUF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SNFRF (14). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew similarly to SNFRF’s over the last 12 months.

SNFRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CBLUF (50). This means that SNFRF’s stock grew similarly to CBLUF’s over the last 12 months.

SNFRF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CBLUF (70). This means that SNFRF’s stock grew similarly to CBLUF’s over the last 12 months.

SNFRF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CBLUF (53). This means that SNFRF’s stock grew similarly to CBLUF’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNFRF (79). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNFRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBLUFSNFRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLNAX24.720.13
+0.53%
MFS Global New Discovery A
HGXFX17.440.09
+0.52%
Hartford Global Impact F
WBSRX35.720.18
+0.51%
William Blair Small Cap Growth R6
TADAX31.800.04
+0.13%
Transamerica US Growth A
JHEQX34.26-0.05
-0.15%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity I

CBLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBLUF and MGROF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBLUF and MGROF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBLUF
1D Price
Change %
CBLUF100%
N/A
MGROF - CBLUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWEL - CBLUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
YARIY - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
LVRO - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.99%
VVIVF - CBLUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.84%
More

SNFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNFRF and VVIVF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNFRF and VVIVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNFRF
1D Price
Change %
SNFRF100%
N/A
VVIVF - SNFRF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.84%
VRDR - SNFRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
MGROF - SNFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUFMF - SNFRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBLUF - SNFRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More