CBLUF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.38B
MGROF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
26.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBLUF vs MGROF

Header iconCBLUF vs MGROF Comparison
Open Charts CBLUF vs MGROFBanner chart's image
China Bluechemical
Price$0.30
Change-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Volume$40K
Capitalization1.38B
MustGrow Biologics
Price$0.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$518
Capitalization26.17M
CBLUF vs MGROF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBLUF vs. MGROF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLUF is a Hold and MGROF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CBLUF: $0.30 vs. MGROF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: CBLUF and MGROF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBLUF: 173% vs. MGROF: 28%
Market capitalization -- CBLUF: $1.38B vs. MGROF: $26.17M
CBLUF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $1.38B. MGROF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $26.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $46.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBLUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGROF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBLUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBLUF is a better buy in the long-term than MGROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBLUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGROF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBLUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MGROF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBLUF is a better buy in the short-term than MGROF.

Price Growth

CBLUF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MGROF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.38% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBLUF($1.38B) has a higher market cap than MGROF($26.2M). CBLUF YTD gains are higher at: 10.701 vs. MGROF (-53.466).
CBLUFMGROFCBLUF / MGROF
Capitalization1.38B26.2M5,279%
EBITDAN/A-5.75M-
Gain YTD10.701-53.466-20%
P/E Ratio9.73N/A-
RevenueN/A7.03M-
Total CashN/A1.82M-
Total DebtN/A3.14M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBLUF vs MGROF: Fundamental Ratings
CBLUF
MGROF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5097
SMR RATING
1..100
70100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5193
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBLUF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGROF (92). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGROF (97). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MGROF (100). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew similarly to MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGROF (93). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

CBLUF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGROF (100). This means that CBLUF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBLUFMGROF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGSGX18.530.21
+1.15%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth A
TAAGX13.680.09
+0.66%
Timothy Plan Small/Mid Cap Growth Cl A
JABAX50.890.12
+0.24%
Janus Henderson Balanced T
HNCYX21.86-0.04
-0.18%
Hartford International Growth Y
FICCX77.91-0.19
-0.24%
Fidelity Advisor Canada I

CBLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBLUF and MGROF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBLUF and MGROF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBLUF
1D Price
Change %
CBLUF100%
N/A
MGROF - CBLUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWEL - CBLUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
YARIY - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
LVRO - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
VVIVF - CBLUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+7.69%
More

MGROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGROF has been loosely correlated with MULG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGROF jumps, then MULG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGROF
1D Price
Change %
MGROF100%
N/A
MULG - MGROF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VVIVF - MGROF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.69%
CBLUF - MGROF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - MGROF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
SNFRF - MGROF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More