CBLUF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.02 (-7.14%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.15B
LVRO
Price
$2.58
Change
-$0.23 (-8.19%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
699.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBLUF vs LVRO

Header iconCBLUF vs LVRO Comparison
Open Charts CBLUF vs LVROBanner chart's image
China Bluechemical
Price$0.26
Change-$0.02 (-7.14%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.15B
Lavoro
Price$2.58
Change-$0.23 (-8.19%)
Volume$1.33K
Capitalization699.65M
CBLUF vs LVRO Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBLUF vs. LVRO commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLUF is a Hold and LVRO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CBLUF: $0.26 vs. LVRO: $2.58)
Brand notoriety: CBLUF and LVRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBLUF: 225% vs. LVRO: 27%
Market capitalization -- CBLUF: $1.15B vs. LVRO: $699.65M
CBLUF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $1.15B. LVRO’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $699.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBLUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLVRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBLUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LVRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBLUF is a better buy in the long-term than LVRO.

Price Growth

CBLUF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LVRO (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +1.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+1.18% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBLUF($1.15B) has a higher market cap than LVRO($700M). LVRO has higher P/E ratio than CBLUF: LVRO (21.01) vs CBLUF (4.46). CBLUF YTD gains are higher at: -5.793 vs. LVRO (-46.138).
CBLUFLVROCBLUF / LVRO
Capitalization1.15B700M165%
EBITDA3.25BN/A-
Gain YTD-5.793-46.13813%
P/E Ratio4.4621.0121%
Revenue13.4BN/A-
Total Cash11.2BN/A-
Total Debt1.05BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBLUF: Fundamental Ratings
CBLUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
69
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTXAX12.70N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Real Assets A
ACBYX14.95-0.13
-0.86%
American Beacon Balanced Y
CWIEX68.33-0.73
-1.06%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc 529E
GCTRX46.90-0.60
-1.26%
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6
OCMPX17.44-0.31
-1.75%
Lazard International Quality Gr Open

CBLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBLUF and MGROF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBLUF and MGROF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBLUF
1D Price
Change %
CBLUF100%
N/A
MGROF - CBLUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWEL - CBLUF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
YARIY - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.69%
LVRO - CBLUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-8.19%
VVIVF - CBLUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.05%
More

LVRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVRO and NITO have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVRO and NITO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVRO
1D Price
Change %
LVRO100%
-8.19%
NITO - LVRO
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.94%
NTR - LVRO
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.05%
CBLUF - LVRO
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICL - LVRO
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
BIOX - LVRO
-2%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More