Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFEX
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFEX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.38
Change+$0.09 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.16M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CBLSX (156M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFEX (1.46) vs CBLSX (0.85). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.53). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFEX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. CBLSX (-18.18). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. CBLSX (-9.70).
| CBLSX | RMFEX | CBLSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.62 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.62 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.897 | 13.941 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.18 | 5.28 | -344% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.43 | 40.09 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.70 | 59.52 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.52 | 98.84 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement