Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFEX
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFEX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.85
Change-$0.06 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.74M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.90
Change-$0.49 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
CBLSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBLSX (159M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFEX (1.43) vs CBLSX (0.83). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.53). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFEX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. CBLSX (-14.81). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.31 vs. CBLSX (-13.25).
| CBLSX | RMFEX | CBLSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.62 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.62 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.460 | 16.703 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.43 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.81 | 9.19 | -161% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.27 | 31.21 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.25 | 57.31 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.70 | 105.64 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement