Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.42
Change-$0.11 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.39M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBLSX (154M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.21) vs CBLSX (0.85). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.53). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. CBLSX (-17.68). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. CBLSX (-14.26).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.91 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.385 | 15.093 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.21 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.68 | 6.67 | -265% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.85 | 30.56 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.26 | 54.90 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.11 | 94.04 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers