Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$11.85
Change-$0.06 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.74M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.48
Change-$0.48 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBLSX (159M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.18) vs CBLSX (0.83). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.53). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. CBLSX (-14.81). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.87 vs. CBLSX (-13.25).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.91 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.460 | 16.369 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.18 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.81 | 8.82 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.27 | 30.01 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.25 | 54.87 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.70 | 97.71 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement