Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLSX vs RMFCX
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLSX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
Price$10.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.04M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
CBLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CBLSX (157M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLSX: RMFCX (1.26) vs CBLSX (1.04). CBLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLSX (21 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBLSX (0.53). CBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLSX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLSX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. CBLSX (7.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.17 vs. CBLSX (-23.13).
| CBLSX | RMFCX | CBLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.91 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.91 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.369 | 2.091 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | 11.33 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.35 | 28.04 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.13 | 44.17 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.38 | 109.86 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers