Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLS vs FHEQ
CBLS vs FHEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLS vs. FHEQ commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLS is a Hold and FHEQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHEQ has more net assets: 514M vs. CBLS (43.7M). CBLS has a higher annual dividend yield than FHEQ: CBLS (9.005) vs FHEQ (5.110). CBLS was incepted earlier than FHEQ: CBLS (5 years) vs FHEQ (1 year). FHEQ (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than CBLS (2.59). CBLS has a higher turnover FHEQ (86.00) vs FHEQ (86.00).
| CBLS | FHEQ | CBLS / FHEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 9.005 | 5.110 | 176% |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 514M | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.59 | 0.48 | 540% |
| Turnover | 509.00 | 86.00 | 592% |
| Yield | 0.68 | 0.70 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CBLS | FHEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CBLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBLS has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBLS jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBLS | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| PWR - CBLS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| NVDA - CBLS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| TSM - CBLS | 66% Closely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| MRVL - CBLS | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| SEI - CBLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||
FHEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHEQ has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHEQ jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHEQ | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| AMZN - FHEQ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| TROW - FHEQ | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AXP - FHEQ | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| KLAC - FHEQ | 75% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| LRCX - FHEQ | 74% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||