Advertisement
CBLDF vs UCAR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLDF is a Hold and UCAR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBLDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUCAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CBLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UCAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
UCAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- UCAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CBLDF (@Home Improvement Chains) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UCAR (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +4.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.57%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Home Improvement Chains (+0.04% weekly)The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.
@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.13% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| CBLDF | UCAR | CBLDF / UCAR | |
| Capitalization | 164M | 11.1M | 1,477% |
| EBITDA | 847M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.125 | -68.097 | 0% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.32 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 11.5B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.91B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.47B | N/A | - |
| UCAR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HILFX | 34.35 | 0.37 | +1.09% |
| Hennessy Large Cap Financial Instl | |||
| NRLCX | 48.76 | 0.43 | +0.89% |
| Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value R6 | |||
| USRAX | 33.31 | 0.22 | +0.66% |
| Horizon Multi-Factor U.S. Equity Inv | |||
| PWTYX | 53.36 | 0.19 | +0.36% |
| UBS US Allocation P | |||
| VLMIX | 35.19 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Value Line Mid Cap Focused Institutional | |||
CBLDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CBLDF and DFRYF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBLDF and DFRYF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBLDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBLDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DFRYF - CBLDF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SDA - CBLDF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| CTNT - CBLDF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| UCAR - CBLDF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| FNEDF - CBLDF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
UCAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UCAR and CRMT have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCAR and CRMT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCAR | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| CRMT - UCAR | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.85% | ||
| MNSO - UCAR | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| CHPT - UCAR | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.43% | ||
| BQ - UCAR | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.44% | ||
| HZO - UCAR | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.56% | ||
More | ||||