CBLDF
Price
$7.99
Change
-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Updated
Mar 17 closing price
Capitalization
163.61M
DFRYF
Price
$52.00
Change
+$1.05 (+2.06%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBLDF vs DFRYF

Header iconCBLDF vs DFRYF Comparison
Open Charts CBLDF vs DFRYFBanner chart's image
Cashbuild
Price$7.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Volume$126
Capitalization163.61M
AVOLTA AG
Price$52.00
Change+$1.05 (+2.06%)
Volume$852
Capitalization8.06B
CBLDF vs DFRYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DFRYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBLDF vs. DFRYF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLDF is a Hold and DFRYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CBLDF: $7.99 vs. DFRYF: $52.00)
Brand notoriety: CBLDF and DFRYF are both not notable
CBLDF represents the Home Improvement Chains, while DFRYF is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBLDF: 100% vs. DFRYF: 561%
Market capitalization -- CBLDF: $163.61M vs. DFRYF: $8.06B
CBLDF [@Home Improvement Chains] is valued at $163.61M. DFRYF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $8.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry ranges from $385.88B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $48.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry is $42.64B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBLDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDFRYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DFRYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DFRYF is a better buy in the long-term than CBLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DFRYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DFRYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CBLDF (@Home Improvement Chains) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DFRYF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +2.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.57%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Improvement Chains (+0.04% weekly)

The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.

@Specialty Stores (+0.63% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFRYF($8.06B) has a higher market cap than CBLDF($164M). DFRYF has higher P/E ratio than CBLDF: DFRYF (52.40) vs CBLDF (15.32). DFRYF YTD gains are higher at: 22.037 vs. CBLDF (-0.125). DFRYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.93B vs. CBLDF (847M). CBLDF has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. DFRYF (935M). CBLDF has less debt than DFRYF: CBLDF (1.47B) vs DFRYF (11.7B). DFRYF has higher revenues than CBLDF: DFRYF (14B) vs CBLDF (11.5B).
CBLDFDFRYFCBLDF / DFRYF
Capitalization164M8.06B2%
EBITDA847M2.93B29%
Gain YTD-0.12522.037-1%
P/E Ratio15.3252.4029%
Revenue11.5B14B82%
Total Cash1.91B935M204%
Total Debt1.47B11.7B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DFRYF: Fundamental Ratings
DFRYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DFRYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DFRYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HILFX34.350.37
+1.09%
Hennessy Large Cap Financial Instl
NRLCX48.760.43
+0.89%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value R6
USRAX33.310.22
+0.66%
Horizon Multi-Factor U.S. Equity Inv
PWTYX53.360.19
+0.36%
UBS US Allocation P
VLMIX35.19-0.01
-0.03%
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Institutional

CBLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBLDF and DFRYF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBLDF and DFRYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBLDF
1D Price
Change %
CBLDF100%
N/A
DFRYF - CBLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDA - CBLDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
CTNT - CBLDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
UCAR - CBLDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
FNEDF - CBLDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DFRYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DFRYF and CBLDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFRYF and CBLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DFRYF
1D Price
Change %
DFRYF100%
N/A
CBLDF - DFRYF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - DFRYF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKRAF - DFRYF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - DFRYF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
DSITF - DFRYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More