Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLCX vs RLBAX
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$56.49
Change+$0.16 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.25B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. CBLCX (10.2B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBAX (1.10) vs CBLCX (0.90). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. CBLCX (5.05). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. CBLCX (23.01).
| CBLCX | RLBAX | CBLCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.248 | 13.947 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 266B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.10 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.05 | 7.84 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.69 | 47.39 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.01 | 37.69 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.99 | 67.66 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers