Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLCX vs RLBAX
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$53.99
Change+$0.23 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.92B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
CBLCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. CBLCX (9.92B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBAX (1.18) vs CBLCX (0.98). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. CBLCX (3.17). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.04 vs. CBLCX (25.96).
| CBLCX | RLBAX | CBLCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.31 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.076 | 7.651 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.92B | 252B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.18 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.17 | 7.00 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.47 | 32.45 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.96 | 37.04 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.64 | 58.01 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement