Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBFX
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBFX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$57.03
Change-$0.72 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.25B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.11
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
CBLAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. CBLAX (10.2B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLAX: RLBFX (1.97) vs CBLAX (1.53). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CBLAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBFX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. CBLAX (5.58). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. CBLAX (25.06).
| CBLAX | RLBFX | CBLAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.335 | 15.095 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.97 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 9.09 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.33 | 43.82 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.06 | 41.33 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.73 | 77.46 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement