Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBCX
CBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBCX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$55.41
Change+$0.14 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.27B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.39
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
CBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. CBLAX (10.3B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CBLAX (1.54) vs RLBCX (1.44). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). CBLAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBCX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. CBLAX (7.49). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.94 vs. CBLAX (22.50).
| CBLAX | RLBCX | CBLAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.144 | 10.350 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.44 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | 8.88 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.96 | 36.46 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.50 | 32.94 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.26 | 70.46 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers