Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBCX
CBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBCX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$57.03
Change-$0.72 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.25B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.80
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
CBLAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. CBLAX (10.2B). CBLAX (1.53) and RLBCX (1.46) have matching dividends . CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CBLAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBCX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. CBLAX (5.58). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.74 vs. CBLAX (25.06).
| CBLAX | RLBCX | CBLAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.335 | 14.512 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.46 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 8.39 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.33 | 41.39 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.06 | 37.74 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.73 | 70.87 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement