Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$57.03
Change-$0.72 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.25B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.66
Change-$0.48 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. CBLAX (10.2B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.53) vs RLBAX (1.08). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. CBLAX (5.58). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. CBLAX (25.06).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.335 | 14.065 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.08 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 7.89 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.33 | 39.62 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.06 | 35.24 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.73 | 66.41 | 108% |