Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$55.41
Change+$0.14 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.27B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.28
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. CBLAX (10.3B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.54) vs RLBAX (1.07). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. CBLAX (7.49). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.69 vs. CBLAX (22.50).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.144 | 9.993 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.07 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | 8.53 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.96 | 34.81 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.50 | 30.69 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.26 | 65.92 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers