Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$56.81
Change+$0.16 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.25B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. CBLAX (10.2B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.56) vs RLBAX (1.10). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. CBLAX (5.85). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. CBLAX (27.60).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.902 | 13.947 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 266B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.10 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 7.84 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.97 | 47.39 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.60 | 37.69 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.20 | 67.66 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement