Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLAX vs RLBAX
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CBLAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Balanced A
Price$55.22
Change+$0.16 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.06B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
CBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. CBLAX (10.1B). CBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CBLAX (1.67) vs RLBAX (1.18). CBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CBLAX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CBLAX (0.93). CBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs CBLAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. CBLAX (7.74). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. CBLAX (29.87).
| CBLAX | RLBAX | CBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.318 | 8.565 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 254B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 9.42 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.65 | 32.14 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.87 | 35.28 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.31 | 58.06 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers