CBL
Price
$36.29
Change
+$7.24 (+24.92%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.11B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAC
Price
$18.80
Change
+$1.74 (+10.20%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.82B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBL vs MAC

Header iconCBL vs MAC Comparison
Open Charts CBL vs MACBanner chart's image
CBL & Associates Properties
Price$36.29
Change+$7.24 (+24.92%)
Volume$187.93K
Capitalization1.11B
Macerich Company (The)
Price$18.80
Change+$1.74 (+10.20%)
Volume$2.44M
Capitalization4.82B
CBL vs MAC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBL vs. MAC commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBL is a Buy and MAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CBL: $36.29 vs. MAC: $18.80)
Brand notoriety: CBL and MAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBL: 118% vs. MAC: 140%
Market capitalization -- CBL: $1.11B vs. MAC: $4.82B
CBL [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.11B. MAC’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $4.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBL is a better buy in the long-term than MAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBL is a better buy in the short-term than MAC.

Price Growth

CBL (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +3.18% price change this week, while MAC (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +6.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

MAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.15% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAC($4.82B) has a higher market cap than CBL($1.11B). MAC has higher P/E ratio than CBL: MAC (55.89) vs CBL (9.07). MAC YTD gains are higher at: 1.842 vs. CBL (-1.919). CBL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 469M vs. MAC (400M). CBL has less debt than MAC: CBL (2.18B) vs MAC (5.15B). MAC has higher revenues than CBL: MAC (1.03B) vs CBL (554M).
CBLMACCBL / MAC
Capitalization1.11B4.82B23%
EBITDA469M400M117%
Gain YTD-1.9191.842-104%
P/E Ratio9.0755.8916%
Revenue554M1.03B54%
Total Cash313MN/A-
Total Debt2.18B5.15B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBL vs MAC: Fundamental Ratings
CBL
MAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5982
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
654
SMR RATING
1..100
2495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9942
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2175

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBL's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MAC (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBL’s stock grew similarly to MAC’s over the last 12 months.

CBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAC (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAC’s over the last 12 months.

CBL's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAC (95) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBL’s stock grew significantly faster than MAC’s over the last 12 months.

CBL's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MAC (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CBL’s stock grew similarly to MAC’s over the last 12 months.

MAC's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBL (99) in the null industry. This means that MAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBLMAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRLAX26.010.56
+2.20%
T. Rowe Price Latin America
FSTUX27.920.16
+0.58%
Invesco Dividend Income Investor
SCJAX8.06N/A
N/A
Steward Covered Call Income A
FNCFX2.54N/A
N/A
Franklin Income R6
HSTAX94.14-0.93
-0.98%
Hartford Stock HLS IA

CBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBL has been closely correlated with SPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBL jumps, then SPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBL
1D Price
Change %
CBL100%
-1.09%
SPG - CBL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
MAC - CBL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
SKT - CBL
68%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
FRT - CBL
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
AKR - CBL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More

MAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAC has been closely correlated with SPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAC jumps, then SPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAC
1D Price
Change %
MAC100%
+0.43%
SPG - MAC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
FRT - MAC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
SKT - MAC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
AKR - MAC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
IVT - MAC
70%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
More