Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHMX vs PTFAX
CBHMX vs PTFAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHMX vs PTFAX
Victory Market Neutral Income Member
Price$8.63
Change+$0.05 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS A
Price$7.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.71M
CBHMX vs PTFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHMX vs. PTFAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHMX is a Hold and PTFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.68B vs. PTFAX (366M). CBHMX pays higher dividends than PTFAX: CBHMX (4.24) vs PTFAX (2.63). CBHMX was incepted earlier than PTFAX: CBHMX (5 years) vs PTFAX (17 years). PTFAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CBHMX (0.73). PTFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHMX (88.00). PTFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHMX: PTFAX (1000) vs CBHMX (3000). CBHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.64 vs. PTFAX (3.37). PTFAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.06 vs. CBHMX (8.68).
| CBHMX | PTFAX | CBHMX / PTFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.53 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.53 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.418 | 5.534 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 366M | 731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.24 | 2.63 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 3.37 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.66 | -2.18 | -444% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.68 | 10.06 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers