Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHMX vs PFATX
CBHMX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHMX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income Member
Price$8.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.69B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$8.13
Change+$0.04 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373.58M
CBHMX vs PFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHMX vs. PFATX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHMX is a Hold and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.69B vs. PFATX (374M). CBHMX pays higher dividends than PFATX: CBHMX (4.22) vs PFATX (2.91). CBHMX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHMX (5 years) vs PFATX (18 years). PFATX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CBHMX (0.73). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHMX (88.00). CBHMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFATX: CBHMX (3000) vs PFATX (1000000). CBHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.25 vs. PFATX (4.48). PFATX return over 5 years is better than : 11.18 vs. CBHMX (6.50).
| CBHMX | PFATX | CBHMX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.665 | 7.819 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.69B | 374M | 720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.22 | 2.91 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.25 | 4.48 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.05 | 0.92 | 1,096% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.50 | 11.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement