Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PTFAX
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PTFAX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.71
Change+$0.06 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS A
Price$7.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.71M
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PTFAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Buy and PTFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.68B vs. PTFAX (366M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than PTFAX: CBHIX (4.35) vs PTFAX (2.63). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PTFAX: CBHIX (13 years) vs PTFAX (17 years). PTFAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PTFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). PTFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PTFAX (1000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.98 vs. PTFAX (2.97). CBHIX (9.65) and PTFAX (9.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CBHIX | PTFAX | CBHIX / PTFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.53 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.53 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.609 | 4.982 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 366M | 731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.35 | 2.63 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 2.97 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.30 | -2.24 | -459% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.65 | 9.49 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.99 | -1.68 | -1,784% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers