Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PTFAX
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PTFAX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.73
Change+$0.05 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS A
Price$7.35
Change-$0.04 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets421.08M
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PTFAX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Hold and PTFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. PTFAX (421M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than PTFAX: CBHIX (4.55) vs PTFAX (3.83). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PTFAX: CBHIX (13 years) vs PTFAX (17 years). PTFAX (1.73) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PTFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). PTFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PTFAX (1000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.64 vs. PTFAX (-5.42). CBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.22 vs. PTFAX (6.77).
| CBHIX | PTFAX | CBHIX / PTFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.73 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.73 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.234 | 1.396 | 375% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 421M | 630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.55 | 3.83 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | -5.42 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.01 | 3.03 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.22 | 6.77 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.33 | -8.85 | -320% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement