Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PTFAX
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PTFAX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.69B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS A
Price$7.57
Change-$0.05 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414M
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PTFAX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Buy and PTFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.69B vs. PTFAX (414M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than PTFAX: CBHIX (4.21) vs PTFAX (3.76). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PTFAX: CBHIX (13 years) vs PTFAX (17 years). PTFAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PTFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). PTFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PTFAX (1000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. PTFAX (0.80). PTFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.01 vs. CBHIX (8.41).
| CBHIX | PTFAX | CBHIX / PTFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.53 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.53 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.311 | 5.120 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.69B | 414M | 650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.21 | 3.76 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 0.80 | 772% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.45 | 4.32 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.41 | 13.01 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.88 | -3.24 | -860% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement