Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PFATX
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$8.13
Change+$0.02 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373.58M
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PFATX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Hold and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.71B vs. PFATX (374M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than PFATX: CBHIX (4.33) vs PFATX (2.91). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHIX (13 years) vs PFATX (18 years). PFATX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHIX (60.00). PFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PFATX (1000000) vs CBHIX (2000000). PFATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. CBHIX (6.38). PFATX return over 5 years is better than : 11.99 vs. CBHIX (10.04).
| CBHIX | PFATX | CBHIX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.13 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.13 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.875 | 8.352 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.71B | 374M | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.33 | 2.91 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 9.96 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.84 | 0.42 | 4,225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.04 | 11.99 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.92 | 5.27 | 568% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers