Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PFATX
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.69B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$7.88
Change-$0.05 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414M
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PFATX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Buy and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.69B vs. PFATX (414M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than PFATX: CBHIX (4.21) vs PFATX (3.91). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHIX (13 years) vs PFATX (18 years). PFATX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). PFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PFATX (1000000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. PFATX (1.20). PFATX return over 5 years is better than : 15.23 vs. CBHIX (8.41).
| CBHIX | PFATX | CBHIX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.13 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.13 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.311 | 5.418 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.69B | 414M | 650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.21 | 3.91 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 1.20 | 516% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.45 | 5.52 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.41 | 15.23 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.88 | 0.70 | 3,997% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement