Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs JMNSX
CBHIX vs JMNSX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs JMNSX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral I
Price$16.13
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets376.72M
CBHIX vs JMNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. JMNSX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a StrongBuy and JMNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. JMNSX (377M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than JMNSX: CBHIX (4.55) vs JMNSX (2.42). CBHIX was incepted earlier than JMNSX: CBHIX (13 years) vs JMNSX (16 years). JMNSX (2.59) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). JMNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). JMNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: JMNSX (1000000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. JMNSX (5.77). JMNSX return over 5 years is better than : 25.78 vs. CBHIX (9.38).
| CBHIX | JMNSX | CBHIX / JMNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.46 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.59 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.474 | 3.075 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 377M | 702% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.55 | 2.42 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.69 | 5.77 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.69 | 33.19 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.38 | 25.78 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.94 | 13.03 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement