Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs JMNCX
CBHIX vs JMNCX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs JMNCX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.74
Change-$0.04 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.7B
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral C
Price$13.10
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets402.69M
CBHIX vs JMNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. JMNCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a StrongBuy and JMNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.7B vs. JMNCX (403M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than JMNCX: CBHIX (4.53) vs JMNCX (2.24). CBHIX was incepted earlier than JMNCX: CBHIX (13 years) vs JMNCX (16 years). JMNCX (3.38) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). JMNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). JMNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: JMNCX (1000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. JMNCX (4.54). JMNCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.58 vs. CBHIX (9.17).
| CBHIX | JMNCX | CBHIX / JMNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 3.23 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 3.38 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.161 | 2.987 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 403M | 670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.53 | 2.24 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.57 | 4.54 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.15 | 27.49 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.17 | 18.58 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.25 | -0.39 | -7,186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement