CBGZF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.02 (+6.90%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
89.18M
YGTFF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
34.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBGZF vs YGTFF

Header iconCBGZF vs YGTFF Comparison
Open Charts CBGZF vs YGTFFBanner chart's image
Cabral Gold
Price$0.31
Change+$0.02 (+6.90%)
Volume$289.18K
Capitalization89.18M
GOLD TERRA RESOURCE
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$202.28K
Capitalization34.23M
CBGZF vs YGTFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YGTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBGZF vs. YGTFF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBGZF is a Hold and YGTFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CBGZF: $0.33 vs. YGTFF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: CBGZF and YGTFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBGZF: 100% vs. YGTFF: 108%
Market capitalization -- CBGZF: $89.18M vs. YGTFF: $34.23M
CBGZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $89.18M. YGTFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $34.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBGZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYGTFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBGZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YGTFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBGZF and YGTFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBGZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YGTFF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBGZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YGTFF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YGTFF is a better buy in the short-term than CBGZF.

Price Growth

CBGZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.14% price change this week, while YGTFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +35.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6013.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBGZF($89.2M) has a higher market cap than YGTFF($34.2M). YGTFF YTD gains are higher at: 104.545 vs. CBGZF (92.146). YGTFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.94M vs. CBGZF (-9.92M). CBGZF has more cash in the bank: 14.3M vs. YGTFF (2.19M). CBGZF (0) and YGTFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CBGZFYGTFFCBGZF / YGTFF
Capitalization89.2M34.2M261%
EBITDA-9.92M-1.94M510%
Gain YTD92.146104.54588%
P/E Ratio31.14N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash14.3M2.19M654%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBGZF vs YGTFF: Fundamental Ratings
CBGZF
YGTFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1127
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
9993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a36

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YGTFF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBGZF (76). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

CBGZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as YGTFF (100). This means that CBGZF’s stock grew similarly to YGTFF’s over the last 12 months.

YGTFF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (99). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

YGTFF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (51). This means that YGTFF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

CBGZF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for YGTFF (100). This means that CBGZF’s stock grew significantly faster than YGTFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBGZFYGTFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YGTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HMENF1.55N/A
N/A
Hemisphere Energy Corp.
IDKOF7.00N/A
N/A
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.
LRLCF420.97N/A
N/A
L'Oreal Co.
YNAJF2.30N/A
N/A
Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd.
DBKSF0.35N/A
N/A
SPETZ INC.

CBGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBGZF and ELRRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBGZF and ELRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBGZF
1D Price
Change %
CBGZF100%
N/A
ELRRF - CBGZF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCEKF - CBGZF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VAUCF - CBGZF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PROBF - CBGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDOFF - CBGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YGTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YGTFF and CBGZF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YGTFF and CBGZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YGTFF
1D Price
Change %
YGTFF100%
+20.00%
CBGZF - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.60%
MAIFF - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.28%
SSRM - YGTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
ZIJMF - YGTFF
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
AUMBF - YGTFF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
More