CBGZF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
19.67M
WDOFF
Price
$9.33
Change
+$0.13 (+1.41%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
780.17M
Ad is loading...

CBGZF vs WDOFF

Header iconCBGZF vs WDOFF Comparison
Open Charts CBGZF vs WDOFFBanner chart's image
Cabral Gold
Price$0.18
Change-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Volume$79.77K
Capitalization19.67M
Wesdome Gold Mines
Price$9.33
Change+$0.13 (+1.41%)
Volume$80.89K
Capitalization780.17M
CBGZF vs WDOFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBGZF vs. WDOFF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBGZF is a Buy and WDOFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CBGZF: $0.18 vs. WDOFF: $9.33)
Brand notoriety: CBGZF and WDOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBGZF: 62% vs. WDOFF: 53%
Market capitalization -- CBGZF: $19.67M vs. WDOFF: $780.17M
CBGZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $19.67M. WDOFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $780.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBGZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBGZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBGZF is a better buy in the long-term than WDOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBGZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDOFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBGZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WDOFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDOFF is a better buy in the short-term than CBGZF.

Price Growth

CBGZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.41% price change this week, while WDOFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDOFF($780M) has a higher market cap than CBGZF($19.7M). CBGZF YTD gains are higher at: 15.707 vs. WDOFF (3.955). WDOFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 44.5M vs. CBGZF (-6.94M). WDOFF has more cash in the bank: 25.1M vs. CBGZF (3.38M). CBGZF has less debt than WDOFF: CBGZF (1.15M) vs WDOFF (53.6M). WDOFF has higher revenues than CBGZF: WDOFF (275M) vs CBGZF (0).
CBGZFWDOFFCBGZF / WDOFF
Capitalization19.7M780M3%
EBITDA-6.94M44.5M-16%
Gain YTD15.7073.955397%
P/E RatioN/A70.42-
Revenue0275M-
Total Cash3.38M25.1M13%
Total Debt1.15M53.6M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBGZF vs WDOFF: Fundamental Ratings
CBGZF
WDOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7968
SMR RATING
1..100
9851
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDOFF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (79). This means that WDOFF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

WDOFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (79). This means that WDOFF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

WDOFF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBGZF (98). This means that WDOFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

WDOFF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (50). This means that WDOFF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

CBGZF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WDOFF (100). This means that CBGZF’s stock grew significantly faster than WDOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBGZFWDOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CBGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
BTC.X104408.070000-53.968750
-0.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

CBGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBGZF and ELRRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBGZF and ELRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBGZF
1D Price
Change %
CBGZF100%
-0.05%
ELRRF - CBGZF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
BCEKF - CBGZF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
VAUCF - CBGZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
PROBF - CBGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
WDOFF - CBGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More

WDOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDOFF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDOFF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDOFF
1D Price
Change %
WDOFF100%
+1.41%
TORXF - WDOFF
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
LUGDF - WDOFF
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
KNTNF - WDOFF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
AYASF - WDOFF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
DPMLF - WDOFF
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
More